Advertising
Advertising

Want to Live a Carefree Life? 30 High Paying Jobs to Fulfill Your Dream

Want to Live a Carefree Life? 30 High Paying Jobs to Fulfill Your Dream

Faced with a career choice and wondering which road to take? Frankly, if you can get a job that you’re passionate about, you’re one of the few lucky ones in the world. But if you’re still figuring out what your ideal job should be like or you need a bunch of money to realize your dream in the future, then why don’t you try the high paying ones first?[1]

It’s Not Only About Getting a High Paying Job, But the Ones on the Rise

Basically, our seniors often advise that if new employees keep their noses to the grind, work untiringly (read uncomplainingly) and keep at it for a few years to come; and pepper their hard work with a little goodwill towards the bosses – they will soon be in a coveted position. And yes, they are right – to a point.

With the Internet now being everyone’s new BFF, the best way to land a high paying job, is to search for a job that is predicted to be high paying this year. And for 2017, here’s the list of high paying jobs that have quite a few openings, and are predicted to be on the rise and have an awesome median base salary to begin with. And to make it easier for you, we’ve also thrown in the qualifications you need to land the high paying jobs.[2]

Top 30 High Paying Jobs in the US

Interested? Here’s a list of the 30 best high paying jobs in the US, arranged in ascending order of average pay from lowest to highest, with the projected growth rates being from 2015 to 2024! [3]

Pharmacist

Average annual pay: $119,270

Projected growth: 3%

    Job Description & Qualification: With the US spending more than $350 billion a year on drugs, being a pharmacist is certainly the way to go. Aspiring pharmacists need to complete two years of undergraduate study before attaining their Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) degree from a pharmacy school and can obtain licensure by passing the North American Pharmacist Licensure Exam.

    Public Relations and Fundraising Manager

    Average annual pay: $119,390

    Projected growth: 7%

      Job Description & Qualification: A cushy if crucial job for these are the people who successfully manage a brand in a very dynamic social media-centric world. Usually an MBA in marketing or PR is what gets you this job, with your level of experience deciding your seniority. However do note that this is a job with a wide pay range with some earning as little as $50,000 a year while some earning almost $200,000!

      General And Operations Manager

      Average annual pay: $119,460

      Projected growth: 5%

        Job Description & Qualification: The people who hold these jobs have diverse qualifications ranging from engineering degrees to MBAs, simply because these are the guys and gals who plan, direct and coordinate the complete operations of organizations, which can be as diverse from pharmaceuticals to girder manufacturers. Most of these jobs can be found in cities with a high population of people and HQs.

        Compensation And Benefits Manager

        Average annual pay: $121,630

        Projected growth: 6%

          Job Description & Qualification: Most employers prefer to hire these managers with a master’s degree in human resources management, finance, or business administration (MBA), though bachelors are also hired at junior positions. Responsibilities basically revolve around deciding the compensation and the benefits of the company’s employees…

          Law Teacher (Post-Secondary)

          Average annual pay: $126,230

          Projected growth: 13%

            Job Description & Qualification: So they say that those who cannot do, teach – and in case you are tired of being a lawyer, how about you start shaping more then? This is one of the best academic lines and the highest paying jobs you could choose, for law school never really go out of business, like ever. The qualifications you need to teach law are the same as you need to practice it, and with some experience to go with that

            Sales Manager

            Average annual pay: $130,400

            Advertising

            Projected growth: 5%

              Job Description & Qualification: If you can sell, well, then you can earn good too! The job of a sales manager is to lead his team, so as to make his company the most profit ever. The qualifications you need for this job are simple, along with a bachelor’s degree and business and marketing major; your motto should be always be closing! However there is a pay variation: Sales managers in the financial industry make an average of $148,000, Manufacturing and wholesale sales managers earn an average of $118,000 and folks in retail earn $81,000.

              Financial Manager

              Average annual pay: $134,330

              Projected growth: 7%

                Job Description & Qualification: With recession disappearing around the corner, being a financial manager is lucrative again. A Bachelor’s Degree in finance, business administration or accounting with a masters being preferred and the job of a financial manager is to make sure the company stays profitable and financially viable at all times.

                Podiatrist

                Average annual pay: $136,180

                Projected growth: 14%

                  Job Description & Qualification: For a “foot doctor”, the average annual pay makes it one of the high paying jobs, since the world now lives longer but with more health problems than ever! To become one, you must complete a four-year graduate training at a podiatric medical school. And in case you are wondering what podiatrists do? Well, they give medical care for people with foot, ankle, and lower leg issues.

                  Lawyer

                  Average annual pay: $136,260

                  Projected growth: 7%

                    Job Description & Qualification: This job does pay well but comes with unending days and work hours. With an ever expanding yet an ever shrinking world at the same time, law can never go out of business as companies and individuals keep infringing on each other’s territories. However, top firm jobs are cushy but there are many a poor struggling lawyer too. To qualify, well you study law and pass the bar.

                    Airline Pilot, Copilot And Flight Engineer

                    Average annual pay: $136,400

                    Projected growth: 5%

                      Job Description & Qualification: A job that keeps you on your toes, the airlines industry does come with plenty of dangers and a whole load of stress. The competition for being a top paid pilot in an aviation giant is fierce but comes with plenty perks. If you want to fly, you need a bachelor’s degree in aircraft operations, aviation, aeronautical engineering, or a related field, plus two months ground training and more than 1,500 hours of flight experience.

                      Natural Sciences Manager

                      Average annual pay: $136,570

                      Projected growth: 3%

                        Job Description & Qualification: A natural science manager is needed in various research and development companies where they direct things like testing, quality control, and production, overseeing the work of scientists. You would need a bachelors I natural sciences and a masters or Ph.D. in a particular discipline, work as a scientist for a few years before moving to managerial level.

                        Marketing Manager

                        Average annual pay: $140,660

                        Projected growth: 9%

                        Advertising

                          Job Description & Qualification: To be a marketing manager you would need a Bachelors and Masters in business or marketing, with extensive experience in the field. Companies always need profit and marketing managers estimate the demand for products, develop pricing strategies and ensure to keep customers satisfied.

                          Computer Information And Systems Manager

                          Average annual pay: $141,000

                          Projected growth: 15%

                            Job Description & Qualification: A cushy job indeed as more and more firms are expanding their business to the digital spheres. If you have a Bachelor’s degree in computer science or IT, along with a Masters in the same field or in business administration, along with some 5-7 years of experience, then you have just landed yourself a great job.

                            Architectural And Engineering Manager

                            Average annual pay: $141,650

                            Projected growth: 2%

                              Job Description & Qualification: Though it is a designer world we now live in, the growth of building has slowed down in developed countries. You need to pass the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam and the Principles and Practice of Engineering (PE) exam for this.

                              Petroleum Engineer

                              Average annual pay: $149,590

                              Projected growth: 10%

                                Job Description & Qualification: A bachelor’s degree in petroleum engineering is needed for an entry level job, which includes class work, labs and field work along with the study of basic sciences such as chemistry, calculus, differential equations and physics. However oil prices dictate if you get a job or not.

                                Nurse Anesthetist

                                Average annual pay: $160,250

                                Projected growth: 31%

                                  Job Description & Qualification: Nurse anesthetists are the highest-paid of all advanced practice registered nurses, and have advance graduate education in the same. You start with a Bachelor’s Degree in Nursing and obtain State Licensure as a Registered Nurse. After experience in Critical Care Nursing you earn a Master’s Degree in Nurse Anesthesia and become a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist. …

                                  Prosthodontist

                                  Average annual pay: $161,020

                                  Projected growth: 18%

                                    Job Description & Qualification: The salary makes this one of the high paying jobs make this a job great for someone looking to give people beautiful smiles! After a doctoral degree in dentistry along with residency, a prosthodontist requires licensure from the American Board of Prosthodontics (ABP).Other than working with cosmetic dental enhancements, prosthodontists also construct oral prostheses to replace missing teeth and other oral structures for the mouth and jaw.

                                    Dentist (Specialist)

                                    Average annual pay: $171,040

                                    Projected growth: 18%

                                    Advertising

                                      Job Description & Qualification: So being a dentist is always a high paying decision and if you are a specialist in dentistry, like pediatric dentists, then as health insurance grows, so will your practice. After a doctoral degree and residency in dentistry, you need postgraduate training in the dental specialty of your choice.

                                      Dentist

                                      Average annual pay: $172,350

                                      Projected growth: 18%

                                        Job Description & Qualification: If you want to keep it simple, then opt to be just a dentist. All you need to do is pass the DAT, and complete your doctoral degree in dentistry with the required residency.

                                        Pediatrician

                                        Average annual pay: $183,180

                                        Projected growth: 14%

                                          Job Description & Qualification: Keeping children healthy is rewarding and the American Academy of Pediatrics states that there is a shortage of pediatricians in any case. After an undergraduate degree, you get your doctors degree in pediatrics and then complete a three-year residency period before getting certified with the board.

                                          Chief Executive

                                          Average annual pay: $185,850

                                          Projected growth: 5%

                                            Job Description & Qualification: So being chief is good, right? To climb your way up the managerial ladder to the CEO position you first need to get a Bachelor’s degree in the relevant field – could be business or public administration or even in a specialized field of your choice. Follow this up with some work experience and an MBA, and then work your way up to it, taking advantage of any company sponsored training programs along the way.

                                            Family And General Practitioner

                                            Average annual pay: $192,120

                                            Projected growth: 14%

                                              Job Description & Qualification: Ultimately while specialists are always need, the sheer abundance of minor ailments make GPs and family doctors very popular indeed and family doctors do pretty well too. To become a GP you need a degree in medicine, recognized by the board, a two-year foundation course of general training and specialist training in general practice as well as well as board certification.

                                              Psychiatrist

                                              Average annual pay: $193,680

                                              Projected growth: 14%

                                                Job Description & Qualification: As stress increases, the mental balance decreases. And the ones who profit from this are the psychiatrists with one of the coolest high paying jobs indeed. You need a Bachelor’s degree, a Masters in psychiatry, complete your residency, obtain a license and then finally get board certified for this.

                                                Internist

                                                Average annual pay: $196,520

                                                Projected growth: 14%

                                                Advertising

                                                  Job Description & Qualification: Internists are doctors who diagnose and provide nonsurgical treatments for diseases and injuries of internal organ systems, and to become one you must complete a minimum of 7 years of medical school and postgraduate training in the same, along with licensure and board certifications.

                                                  Physician (Others)

                                                  Average annual pay: $197,700

                                                  Projected growth:18%

                                                    Job Description & Qualification: Any doctor’s job like the ones stated above are good, even if they are slightly non classic like research or at medical schools. You need a doctorate in medicine for this, like with all other doctor degrees.

                                                    Orthodontist

                                                    Average annual pay: $221,390

                                                    Projected growth: 18%

                                                      Job Description & Qualification: Orthodontists set teeth and jaws straight, more for functional purposes than for aesthetic reasons. To become one you first need to become a doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) or the equivalent Doctor of Dental Medicine (DMD) and then complete orthodontic specialized training, get a license and get certified.

                                                      Obstetricians and Gynecologists

                                                      Average annual pay: $222,400

                                                      Projected growth: 18%

                                                        Job Description & Qualification: These physicians provide medical care related to pregnancy or childbirth, and the reproductive system. To become one you first need your undergraduate degree and then graduation from medical training, post which you complete specialized training in obstetrics and gynecology and you residency. Licensure and Certification are the final steps.

                                                        Oral And Maxillofacial Surgeon

                                                        Average annual pay: $233,900

                                                        Projected growth: 18%

                                                          Job Description & Qualification: Yet again, the medicinal and dental field delivers. If you become an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, you get a one of the best high paying jobs, but not without effort. After UG and a doctor’s degree, you will need at least four years of additional surgery training to be able to treat facial traumas, cleft lips and even patients with head, neck and oral cancer.

                                                          Surgeon

                                                          Average annual pay: $247,520

                                                          Projected growth: 14%

                                                            Job Description & Qualification: If you’ve always loved to disassemble fix and put things back together, then you might just be a great surgeon. Of course, you have to put n quite a number of years to become one – an undergraduate degree, a medicinal doctor degree and then many years of specialized surgery training and residency!

                                                            Anesthesiologist

                                                            Average annual pay: $258,100

                                                            Projected growth: 14%

                                                              Job Description & Qualification: Being an anesthesiologist in the US is one of the best high paying jobs indeed! It does take years of study though, four years of undergraduate Degree, about four years of a Medical Degree and then residency aka four years of postgraduate training! Anesthesiologists do walk a fine line, administering anesthesia prior to, during or after surgeries and other medical procedures keeping patients in comfort but in the healthy range.

                                                              So basically, getting to do something you love and getting well paid for it is like having your cake, and eating it too! Right? So here’s wishing you the best for your job search for these great high paying jobs…

                                                              Reference

                                                              More by this author

                                                              Rima Pundir

                                                              Health, Wellness & Productivity Writer

                                                              Stiff Muscles Make You Feel Sick Often: 8 Natural Muscle Relaxers You Can’t Miss When You Drive And Don’t Drink Enough Water, It’s As Dangerous As Drunk Driving Having A Glass Of This Drink Before You Sleep Can Burn Your Fat Insanely Fast How Common Language Can Help You Strengthen Your Friendship Introducing 13 Useful Free Apps For you To Install Today

                                                              Trending in Productivity

                                                              1 Master These 10 Management Skills to Become a Strong Leader 2 How to Upgrade Your Critical Thinking Skills and Make Smart Choices 3 What Are Analytical Skills and How to Strengthen Them For Success 4 How to Break Bad Habits: I Broke 3 Bad Habits in Less Than 2 Months 5 How Long Does It Take to Break a Habit? Science Will Tell You

                                                              Read Next

                                                              Advertising
                                                              Advertising
                                                              Advertising

                                                              Last Updated on February 20, 2019

                                                              How to Upgrade Your Critical Thinking Skills and Make Smart Choices

                                                              How to Upgrade Your Critical Thinking Skills and Make Smart Choices

                                                              As humans, we typically operate on cognitive autopilot. We rarely stop and reflect on how we interpret information and create mental models which replicate our perception of reality.

                                                              But when our mental models fail to match reality, we simply ignore reality and operate throughout the day on implicit assumptions. These are not conscious choices. Our mental models allow us a simple way to cope with reality, yet we fail to confront reality when it is different than our mental model. Essentially, we have unknowingly created a ready-made default mechanism. [1]

                                                              So, what can we do?

                                                              We must first take time to reflect on our critical thinking skills. By simply understanding how you interpret and perceive information differently than everyone else is a great first step. To truly upgrade your critical thinking skills, you must examine how thoughts arise in your mind and how they got there.

                                                              Critical thinking is about asking yourself how you make choices. We can choose to believe something we hear or see; however, why do we choose to believe something we hear or see?

                                                              As a Red Team Member in the U.S. Army, I will explain how I upgrade my critical thinking skills using Colonel John Boyd’s OODA Loop as a framework for critical thinking. I will then demonstrate practical ways to upgrade your critical thinking skills for a sharper mind using tools and techniques from the University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies (UFMCS) Center for Applied Critical Thinking (also known as the Red Team school) and The Applied Critical Thinking Handbook (also known as The Red Team Handbook).[2]

                                                              What Is Critical Thinking?

                                                              Critical thinking can be explained in a number of ways. Let’s quickly examine a few definitions:

                                                              • “Critical thinking is a process, the goal of which is to make reasonable decisions about what to believe and what to do.” – Robert Enis
                                                              • “Critical thinking means developing an ever better worldview and using it well in all aspects of your life. The essence of critical thinking is questioning and arguing logically.” – Gary Jason
                                                              • “Critical thinking is searching for hidden assumptions, noticing various facets, unraveling different strands, and evaluating what is most significant. It implies conscious, deliberate inquiry, and especially it implies adopting a skeptical state of mind.” – Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau

                                                              To me, critical thinking is as follows:

                                                              “Critical thinking is observing the world with an open and skeptical mindset with the goal of exploring all alternatives objectively (as much as possible). It is our ability to orient our mental models to view reality through an emotionless lens seeking the truth by questioning our own assumptions and deconstructing arguments logically. It is our ability to identify gaps and uncover what is missing to improve our quality of decisions. Finally, it is our ability to unravel different strands of significant information through a continuous stream of feedback so that we continuously destroy and create new mental models allowing us to act closer to reality.” – Dr. Jamie Schwandt

                                                              Critical Thinking Framework: OODA Loop

                                                              I use John Boyd’s OODA Loop as a framework for critical thinking. It is similar to Swarm Intelligence, where we use simple rules to allow the collective intelligence to emerge. The simple rules are Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act.

                                                                The OODA Loop is a high-speed decision making and feedback process in four stages: Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act.[3] The OODA Loop is a continuous feedback loop where the objective is to go through the loop faster than your opponent.

                                                                I use simple rules provided within the OODA Loop to assist me in speeding up my critical and creative thinking abilities. However, do not confuse the word “simple” with “simplistic” as the OODA Loop uses simple rules within a complex system (which is exactly what the OODA Loop is).

                                                                The key to the loop is feedback. The OODA Loop is similar to Double-Loop Learning, where the goal is to modify decision-making in light of new experience.

                                                                Double-Loop Learning is the first loop uses goals or decision making rules, the second loop enables their modification… hence, double-loop.[4]

                                                                  Chris Argyris writes about Double-Loop Learning in Teaching Smart People How To Learn,

                                                                  “A thermostat that automatically turns on the heat whenever the temperature in a room drops below 68 degree is a good example of single-loop learning. A thermostat that could ask why am I set to 68 degree? and then explore whether or not some other temperature might more economically achieve the goal of heating the room would be engaged in double-loop learning.

                                                                  The overarching guide for my use of the OODA Loop is as follows:

                                                                  Scout Mindset

                                                                  I will talk about this more in the How-To Guide: Tools to Apply the Critical Thinker’s OODA Loop section below.

                                                                  Advertising

                                                                  Objectivity

                                                                  It’s about seeking truth. Here we should seek to follow a concept introduced by Immanuel Kant as a way of evaluating motivations for actions – called the Categorical Imperative. Kant defines a categorical imperative as an absolute or an unconditional requirement that must be obeyed in all circumstances and is justified as an end in itself. For example, “Act only according to the maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law.” For more information, visit the Categorical Imperative.

                                                                  Avoid Emotion

                                                                  Imagine you can physically remove yourself from your body and objectively view how you make decisions. It’s like pulling your mind from your body.

                                                                  Reasoning Backwards

                                                                  This is essentially solving problems by working backwards. A simple example of this method is working backwards to solve a math problem.

                                                                  For example, solve the following problem: “I think of a number and add three to it, multiply the result by 2, subtract 4 and divide by 7. The number I end up with is 2. What was the number I first thought of?” To solve, read the problem backwards. You start with: 2 x 7 = 14. Then take 14 + 4 = 18. From there take 18 / 2 = 9. Then take 9 – 3 = 6. Finally, the number you first thought of was 6.

                                                                  Moreover, Reasoning Backwards can be viewed through the lens of deduction. I prefer deduction over induction and here is why:

                                                                  An example of Inductive Reasoning is: this raven is black, that raven is black, all ravens are black.

                                                                  Deductive Reasoning is: All ravens are black, that raven is black, therefore it is black.

                                                                  We make deductions from laws to see what should happen and then experiment to see if our prediction was right. Think about it this way… to test whether a burner is hot, we must touch the burner first using Inductive Reasoning; however, if we were to use Deductive Reasoning, we would first predict the burner to be hot and would realize there is not need to touch it.

                                                                  One last benefit of Reasoning Backwards is that it forces our linear and logical mind to catch things we wouldn’t normally catch. For example, read the following sentence:

                                                                  After reading this sentence, you will realize that the the brain doesn’t recognize a second ‘the’.

                                                                  Now read the sentence again, this time read it backwards. Did you notice that you missed the second ‘the’?

                                                                  Think-Write-Share

                                                                  The UFMCS uses this as the single most important idea to enable critical thinking. For example, prior to taking on an issue, we should first think independently and reflectively, then write down our thoughts (which assists us in shaping and refining them), then share them in a disciplined manner. This takes us from divergence to convergence.

                                                                  Dialectical Method

                                                                  Boyd described a thought experiment in a presentation called Strategic Game of ? and ?. Through the process of Destructive Deduction (analyze and pull apart mental concepts into discrete parts) and Creative Induction (using these elements to form new mental concepts) we can create a new mental model that more closely aligns with reality.

                                                                  Part 1 of his question:

                                                                  “Imagine that you are on a ski slope with other skiers…that you are in Florida riding in an outboard motorboat, maybe even towing water-skiers. Imagine that you are riding a bicycle on a nice spring day. Imagine that you are a parent taking your son to a department store and that you notice he is fascinated by the toy tractors or tanks with rubber caterpillar treads.”

                                                                  Part 2:

                                                                  “Now imagine that you pull the skis off but you are still on the ski slope. Imagine also that you remove the outboard motor from the motorboat, and you are no longer in Florida. And from the bicycle you remove the handle-bar and discard the rest of the bike. Finally, you take off the rubber treads from the toy tractor or tanks. This leaves only the following separate pieces: skis, outboard motor, handlebars and rubber treads.”

                                                                  What do you imagine could be created using the remaining parts? A Snowmobile

                                                                  Let’s now turn our attention to the four simple rules within the OODA Loop.

                                                                  The Critical Thinker’s OODA Loop: Simple Rules to Guide You

                                                                  Advertising

                                                                    Observe

                                                                    Think of how we use sensors and gather information. In an ant colony, this is where ants shoot pheromones to signal others when they have found food.

                                                                    Here we are detecting events within our environment and identifying change (or lack thereof). This could also be identified as Locate or Perceive (think swarming tactics or artificial intelligence).

                                                                    Steps:

                                                                    • Find out what is really there.
                                                                    • Observe first and gather data.
                                                                    • Identify the uncommon and common things. As Sherlock Holmes famously said, “What is out of common is a guide.” A great video on this point is The most unlikely threat from the hit movie Men in Black – watch the following video:
                                                                    • Begin with a blank and open mind.
                                                                    • Remember that there is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.

                                                                    Key questions to ask:

                                                                    • What happened?
                                                                    • What are we being asked?
                                                                    • What do we know?

                                                                    Key tools to use:

                                                                    • 6 Words. This is simply writing a short and precise phrase summarizing your thinking into a set number of words.
                                                                    • Think-Write-Share (see above)
                                                                    • Outside-in thinking
                                                                    • Key assumptions check. We all start with assumptions and it is extremely important to be aware of our own. Understanding this will allow us to explain the logic of an argument and expose faulty logic. It will also help us simulate thinking about a problem and uncover hidden links between factors. Let’s examine some key questions to ask here: 1) How much confidence do you have with this assumption?; 2) What explains your confidence with this assumption?; 3) What must exist for this assumption to be valid?; and 4) If this assumption proves wrong, will this change your line of thinking about the issue?
                                                                    • Complex Grammatical Structures

                                                                    Orient

                                                                    Think of a construction site where destruction (analysis) and creation (synthesis) take place.

                                                                    John Boyd identified orientation as our way to survive and grow within a complex and ever changing world. This could also be identified as Converge or Understand.

                                                                    Steps:

                                                                    • Identify your biases and know how they impact decision making.
                                                                    • Be aware of your worldview and how it shapes the world you see.
                                                                    • Be aware of multiple perspectives and not just your own.
                                                                    • Place new observations in context with older observations.
                                                                    • Reason carefully. Find out what others cannot.
                                                                    • Determine what is vital (think of the Pareto Principle).
                                                                    • Seek out what’s NOT right in front of you (determine what’s missing).
                                                                    • Remember what Sherlock Holmes said, “Never make exceptions. An exception disproves the rule.”
                                                                    • Think in terms of metaphors and analogies.

                                                                    Key questions to ask:

                                                                    • Where are the pattern of bullet holes NOT located?
                                                                    • Why?
                                                                    • What are we missing?
                                                                    • Where are the gaps?
                                                                    • What are the relationships?
                                                                    • What are the different perspectives?

                                                                    Key tools to use:

                                                                    • Argument Deconstruction (see below).
                                                                    • 4 Ways of Seeing. This is a powerful tool for looking at multiple perspectives.
                                                                      • Dialectical Method (thesis, antithesis, synthesis)
                                                                      • Analysis + Synthesis. By breaking a concept or problem apart (analysis) we develop knowledge; yet, it’s when we piece the parts back together (synthesis) and create something new that we develop understanding or wisdom.
                                                                      • Onion Model. Hofstede’s Onion Model is a great tool to find values at the core. It is a great way to prompt better questions, look at something or someone or some group from multiple perspectives, and expose ignorance.
                                                                        • neXt – Innovative Framework. Professor Ramesh Raskar, head of MIT Media Lab’s Camera Culture Research Group, created an easy-to-use framework for inventing the future – right now. Watch the following video:

                                                                        Decide

                                                                        Think of a hypothesis like you would when putting a puzzle together, where you are making predictions then testing those predictions.

                                                                        Here we are to decide among alternatives generated in the orientation phase. This could be identified as Attack or Predict.

                                                                        Steps:

                                                                        • Identify and select your next action based on orientation and local knowledge.
                                                                        • Find the dog who isn’t barking (see below in the How-to guide: Tools to apply the critical thinker’s OODA Loop section).
                                                                        • Determine what would have to exist for something to be true.
                                                                        • Think like Sherlock Holmes – eliminate the impossible so that what remains (however improbable) is the truth.
                                                                        • Think like a detective – piece out what is key evidence verses artifact (not important).
                                                                        • Try to prove the opposite (Devil’s Advocacy Red Team tool).

                                                                        Key questions to ask:

                                                                        • What evidence is not being seen for the hypothesis to be true?
                                                                        • Where are the pattern of bullet holes not located?
                                                                        • What is vital evidence and what is simply an artifact (which will get you stuck in the wrong rabbit hole)?
                                                                        • Where is the dog who isn’t barking?

                                                                        Key tools to use:

                                                                        • Algorithmic Thinking (IF – AND – THEN).
                                                                        • Cynefin Framework
                                                                        • Lean Six Sigma
                                                                        • Devils Advocacy. Here you are trying to prove the opposite and disprove the hypothesis. Essentially, you are trying to prove the limitations.
                                                                        • Alternative Futures Analysis
                                                                        • Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) (see below)
                                                                        • The Value of Possible. Here is a logical system incorporating elements of language. In this method, we have three truth values: False, True, and Possible. Logical connective rules: True is p, Possible is q, and False has no value. This allows for something to be fuzzy (not clearly black or white… true or false) but could still be true.

                                                                        Act

                                                                        Think of testing and retesting a hypothesis.

                                                                        According to Boyd, actions should be rapid, surprising, ambiguous, and ever changing. This could be identified as Disperse or Learn.

                                                                        Steps:

                                                                        • Carry out your decision (or selected action) while the opponent is still observing the last action.[5]
                                                                        • Present your information in simple ways. For example, use SEE-I and What? – So What? – Now What? to describe your situation/problem/scenario.
                                                                        • As Sherlock Holmes said, “Nothing clears up a case so much as stating it to another person.”
                                                                        • Develop quick “fly-like” reactions.
                                                                        • Use simple rules to guide your actions or the actions of a group.
                                                                        • Find the desired path. For example, watch how routes on a college campus naturally form. Wouldn’t it be interesting if we allowed these to naturally form then simply pave those locations. For more on this idea, watch the following video Find and Pave the Desired Path:

                                                                        Key questions to ask:

                                                                        • What did I learn?
                                                                        • What type of feedback did I receive?
                                                                        • What type of feedback am I still receiving (we are continuously receiving feedback)?
                                                                        • What can I do with this new information as my OODA Loop begins again?

                                                                        Key tools to use:

                                                                        Advertising

                                                                        How to Apply the Critical Thinker’s OODA Loop

                                                                        1. Argument Deconstruction

                                                                        The UFMCS provides a powerful framework for deconstructing an argument.

                                                                        The method:

                                                                        • What is the argument? Here the argument = problem (or premise) + reasons + conclusion
                                                                        • Check to make sure the right problem is identified and examine the point of view of the other person.
                                                                        • Search for and ask for clarification of ambiguous words.
                                                                        • Look for value conflicts and check key assumptions. More specifically, look for prescriptive assumptions (statement made on the way things should be) and descriptive assumptions (statement made on the way things are).
                                                                        • Look for logical fallacies.
                                                                        • Is the person using a heuristic or rule of thumb?
                                                                        • Check the evidence provided. Does the person use personal experience, potentially deceptive statistics (use numbers without percentages – percentages without numbers), appeal to authorities, faulty analogies, intuition, etc.
                                                                        • Is there another plausible hypotheses which might explain the situation?
                                                                        • Are there any other conclusions you can draw from the argument?
                                                                        • What implications does accepting the argument pose?

                                                                        2. The 4 Agreements

                                                                        Another great way the U.S. Army Red Team community upgrades their critical thinking ability is through the following four agreements:

                                                                        1. Don’t make assumptions.
                                                                        2. Don’t take anything personal.
                                                                        3. Be impeccable with your words.
                                                                        4. Always do your best.

                                                                        Finally, I recommend using the following mnemonic. I created this tool to assist me as I move through the Critical Thinker’s OODA Loop. Additionally, I recommend writing this down on a note-card and keeping a copy with you at all times.

                                                                        3. SDWFAP

                                                                        Scouting

                                                                        Think like a Scout – the drive to see what’s really there.

                                                                        In the following video Why you think you’re right-even if you’re wrong, Julia Galef examines the motivation between two mindsets (Scout mindset vs Soldier mindset) and how they shape the way we interpret information:

                                                                        Galef explains that Scouts are curious and are more likely to feel pleasure when they learn new information. She says it’s like an itch to solve a puzzle. We should strive to develop a Scout Mindset. Let’s examine qualities Scout’s possess:

                                                                        • The Scout’s job is not to attack or defend, but to understand – to go out, map the terrain and identify potential obstacles.
                                                                        • Scout’s are intrigued when they encounter something that contradicts their expectations.
                                                                        • More likely to think it’s virtuous to test your own beliefs.
                                                                        • They do not say someone is weak for simply changing their mind.
                                                                        • They are grounded; meaning their self-worth isn’t tied to how right or wrong they are about an argument.
                                                                        • They are proud (and not ashamed) when they notice they might be wrong about something.
                                                                        • They are intrigued (and not defensive) when they encounter information that contradicts their beliefs.
                                                                        • They yearn not to defend their beliefs, but to see the world as clearly as they possibly can.
                                                                        • Above all, the Scout seeks to know what’s really there.
                                                                        Dog

                                                                        Find the Dog who isn’t barking.

                                                                        In Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes story Silver Blaze, we are presented with a mystery of the disappearance of a famous racehorse the night prior to a race and the murder of the horse’s trainer. Mike Skotnicki describes the story about The Dog that Didn’t Bark:

                                                                        “The dog that didn’t bark. What we can learn from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle about using the absence of expected facts.” – Mike Skotnicki

                                                                        Sherlock Holmes solves the mystery in part by recognizing that no one he spoke to in his investigation remarked that they had heard barking from the watchdog during the night.

                                                                        Gregory (Scotland Yard detective), “Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?”

                                                                        Sherlock Holmes, “To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.”

                                                                        Gregory, “The dog did nothing in the night-time.”

                                                                        Sherlock Holmes, “That was the curious incident.”

                                                                        The fact that the dog did not bark when we would have expected it to while the horse was stolen led Holmes to the conclusion that the criminal was not a stranger to the dog, but someone the dog recognized; thus, would not cause the dog to bark.

                                                                        Was

                                                                        What would have to exist for something to be true?

                                                                        Here we can use a UFMCS Red Team tool called What If? Analysis. This tool assumes an event has already happened with potential impact (positive or negative) and explains how it might play out. This is a powerful technique for challenging a closed mindset by shifting the focus from whether an event could occur to how it might happen.

                                                                        The method:

                                                                        Advertising

                                                                        • Clearly state the conventional line assuming the event has happened, then step back and consider what alternative outcomes are too important to dismiss, even if unlikely.
                                                                        • Select triggering events that allowed the event to happen.
                                                                        • Develop a chain of argumentation.
                                                                        • Reason backwards from the event in concrete ways (specify what must occur at each stage).
                                                                        • Choose one or more plausible pathways.
                                                                        • Develop and monitor a list of indicators or observables for each scenario that would assist in detecting the beginning of the event.

                                                                        Another technique you can use here is The Reductio ad Absurdum. This is a simple yet powerful tool.

                                                                        The method:

                                                                        • Assume a statement to be true and see what conclusions you can discern from it. If you find you get a contradiction, you know the initial statement is false as contradictions are always false.
                                                                        • It allows you to determine if a statement is false by showing the contradiction.

                                                                        For more on this technique, I recommend reading Logic: A Graphic Guide.

                                                                        Frightened

                                                                        What’s not right in Front of us?

                                                                        Here we can use a combination of tools and techniques.

                                                                        For example, if you have a team or group of people, you could use what’s called a Premortem and/or Postmortem Analysis. This is an application of mental stimulation and is a great tool for Group Think Mitigation. We could use the 5-Why technique after we have asked what happened. We could also use Algorithmic Thinking where we perform an If-And-Then series of questions.

                                                                        Let’s combine the three and see how this can be used:

                                                                        • Assume an event has happened or after an event has happened – use 5-Why to identify causes as to why this event happened.
                                                                        • Generate a list of reasons for the event with the following simple rules: 1) The more ideas the better; 2) Build on other peoples ideas using them as prompts for your own; 3) Wacky ideas are fine (and sometimes preferred).
                                                                        • Ask a series of If-And-Then questions:
                                                                        • IF an Active Shooter is spotted AND appropriate signals are in place THEN we should be able to act/respond quicker.
                                                                        • This can also be used with Propositional Calculus. For example, “If you are a bird, then you have wings,” could be rephrased as, “You cannot be a bird and not have wings.” It is a proposition using one connective such as: IF-Then. It can then be transformed into an expression using the other connectives “and” and “not” without changing the validity of the statement.
                                                                        At

                                                                        Ask what evidence is not being seen, but would be expected for a hypothesis to be true.

                                                                          Conduct an Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH). The objective is to identify alternative explanations (hypotheses) and evaluate the evidence that will disconfirm rather than confirm the hypotheses. This is how I reason backwards.

                                                                          The method:

                                                                          • Brainstorm and list all possible hypotheses (no matter how improbable they may seem). List the hypotheses first then the evidence (think deductive reasoning). You can list the evidence first, then the hypotheses if you prefer (think inductive reasoning).
                                                                          • List all significant evidence and arguments relevant to each hypotheses.
                                                                          • Reason backwards by creating a divergent systems diagram with each hypotheses from right to left (to mimic backwards reasoning)
                                                                          • Start to converge by preparing a matrix listing the hypotheses across the top with each piece of evidence down the side.
                                                                          • Determine if each piece of evidence is consistent, inconsistent, or non applicable.
                                                                          • Refine the matrix by reconsidering each hypotheses. Here you can even add new information if applicable.
                                                                          • Focus on disproving each hypotheses rather than proving one. Tally your evidence that are inconsistent and consistent to see which hypotheses are the weakest and strongest (you can also identify this using your systems diagram… +/- for strong and weak connections).
                                                                          • Ask what evidence is not being seen, but would be expected for a given hypotheses to be true. Ask if denial and/or deception is a possibility.
                                                                          • Identify and monitor indicators that would be consistent and inconsistent with each hypotheses.

                                                                          A good example of ACH can be found at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

                                                                          Patterns

                                                                          Where are the Pattern (or location) of bullet holes NOT located?

                                                                            Statistician Abraham Wald was tasked with helping the Allies decide where to add armor to bombers during World War II.[6] The Allies hoped extra protection would help minimize bomber losses due to enemy anti-aircraft fire. They thought the answer was obvious and the bombers returning from missions showed them where to put the extra armor. However, Wald disagreed. He explained the damage actually revealed the locations that needed the least additional armor. In essence, it’s where the bombers could be hit and still survive the flight home.

                                                                            This is an example of selection or survivorship bias, where we typically only consider information that’s presented to us and ignore information that is absent, yet might just be significantly relevant. For example, the locations on the bombers without bullet holes might just be the location to reinforce.

                                                                            Finally, we should be extremely carefully of what we remove from a system or process. We have to be aware of the second and third order effects.

                                                                            I will leave you with one final video: How Wolves Change Rivers:

                                                                            More Resources About Boosting Brain Power

                                                                            Featured photo credit: Unsplash via unsplash.com

                                                                            Reference

                                                                            [1] University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies: The Applied Critical Thinking Handbook
                                                                            [2] USA Army: The Applied Critical Thinking Handbook
                                                                            [3] Frans P.B. Osinga: Science, Strategy and War
                                                                            [4] Wikipedia: Double-loop learning
                                                                            [5] Ahmad Shehabat and Teodor Mitew: Distributed Swarming and Stigmergic Effects on ISIS Networks OODA Loop Model
                                                                            [6] Seeking Alpha: How Survivorship Bias Distorts Reality

                                                                            Read Next