⌄ Scroll down to continue ⌄

Don’t Try To Be A Smart Alec If You Don’t Know This

⌄ Scroll down to continue ⌄
Don’t Try To Be A Smart Alec If You Don’t Know This

“Understanding” and “knowing” are two words that are often used interchangeably. While the two concepts are related, they are not actually the same. Each is a unique “mental state” that involves cognitive grasp. The problem is that the use of the two is often conflated across the industry spectrum, from writing to science and everything in-between.

So what is the difference between “understanding” and “knowing”? Which is better: knowing or understanding something? In his article – It’s better to Understand Something than to Know It – featured on Quartz, Ephrat Livni gives the answers.

⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄

⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄

Knowledge and Understanding are Different

According to the article, knowing is static, “referring to discrete facts.” On the other hand, understanding is an active concept that describes the capacity to analyse and put these concrete facts in context to build a big picture. It goes further to state that knowledge is not necessarily to “understanding of the bigger narrative.” However, understanding can prove impossible without knowledge which forms the basis for gathering information. At the minimum, understanding is a tool that allows people to collect information and make sense of it.

⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄
⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄

Relevance to Communication in Science

Understanding is the central tenet of gathering information. For scientists, the concepts can be quite obscure. That is why scientists must learn how to communicate science to the masses effectively. According to the article, facts (information) must be gathered, analysed, and contextualised to link cause to effect. That can only occur when facts can be coupled with understanding. Definitions are also crucial to scientists; otherwise, language conflations cause further confusion in science and society.

⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄
⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄

It’s better to understand than to know something

Understanding is paramount when looking to weave facts. It’s also essential when contextualizing gathered information. That is right; it is impossible to evaluate knowledge without understanding. On the overall, scientific literacy in public can only become possible when there is real understanding.

⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄
⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄

Definitions make huge difference

Although science knowledge in public relies on gathered data, it is true understanding that bolsters scientific literacy. Even so, this can only be achieved when understanding is well defined and understood. By defining it, we can “weave, analyse, and contextualise” information without much fuss. This way, they can effectively communicate science to the public.

Learn more about why understanding something is better than knowing it by reading the entire articlehere.

⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄

⌄ Scroll down to continue reading article ⌄

More by this author

Brian Lee

Ex-chief of product management at Lifehack

2 Minutes Book Summary: Talk Like TED
2 Minutes Book Summary: Talk Like TED
the productivity project book cover
1 Minute Book Summary: The Productivity Project
2 Minutes Book Summary: How to Read a Book
2 Minutes Book Summary: How to Read a Book
1 Minute Book Summary: Always Hungry?
1 Minute Book Summary: Always Hungry?
I hate my job
What to Do When You Hate Your Job (for Both Who Choose to Stay or Quit)

Trending in Smartcut

1 10 Effective Ways To Make You a Fast Learner 2 50 LinkedIn Influencers To Follow, No Matter Your Industry 3 10 Best Mechanical Keyboards to Type Faster 4 25 Soft Skills You Need to Be Successful in Life 5 The Definitive Guide to Get out of Debt Fast (and Forever)

Read Next

Advertising
Advertising

Explore the Full Life Framework

Advertising
Advertising