Advertising
Advertising

Six Jobs that pay Surprisingly High Salaries

Six Jobs that pay Surprisingly High Salaries

Often we think of high-paying jobs being those for which people have gone through a lengthy training period, such as doctors, dentists, and solicitors. However, academic qualifications alone are not always the precursor to a successful career. Here we look at six jobs which pay unexpectedly well, none of which tie you down to an office cubicle.

Stonemason

Stonemasonry is a skilled profession and salaries rise with the level of expertise. Stonemasons carry out a wide variety of work including repairing buildings and monuments, creating memorial headstones, and making original stonework for homes and gardens. While a starting salary can be around the £15,000 mark, this rises to £35,000 for experienced stonemasons and even higher for those who are self-employed or who have a particular in-demand speciality.

Advertising

Hazardous Waste Manager

For those with excellent organizational skills and a willingness to flirt with danger, the role of hazardous waste manager might be right. The salary is usually around £37,000 and for this you will need to inventory all possible hazardous waste material within an organization and deal with its safe disposal. This may sometimes involve relatively innocuous items such as IT equipment. However, it can also include medical waste or hazardous chemicals. Therefore, expertise in particular areas means that you can command a much higher salary than the average for the profession.

Advertising

Events Manager

Events managers can work in many fields on a self-employed basis as well as being employed by companies. An events manager oversees the planning, organisation, and roll-out of a wide variety of public and private events including weddings, concerts, festivals, corporate events, and conventions. Days can be long and the hours lonely, but the reward of seeing something through to completion is often worth it. The average salary is around £30,000 but can vary widely, particularly if you set up your own business and become well-known for certain types of events.

Advertising

Butler

You many think that the role of butler died out in the era of Downton Abbey but British butlers are still very much in demand around the world. Today butlers can be called on to undertake a wide variety of tasks from running a household, chauffeuring, wardrobe management, and even cooking. While particular academic qualifications are not a requirement, graduation from a school such as the British Butler Institute is an advantage. A newly-qualified butler can expect to earn around £35,000 and this can rise to £90,000 depending on experience and where you are employed.

Truck Driver

For many, the appeal of becoming a truck driver is life on the open road. While hours can be long and it is often necessary to spend time away from friends and family, the rewards can be worth it. An average salary for a truck driver in the UK is around £27,000 and with a current national shortage of HGV drivers this is a career with plenty of opportunity. Once you have gained experience, you can become self-employed or even set up your own haulage company and this can substantially increase your remuneration. People may perceive driving a truck as boring, but it can actually be thrilling.

Ethical Hacker

While the title may surprise, ethical hackers are not on the wrong side of the law but rather are employed by large companies and government departments, such as GCHQ, to see if there are any weaknesses in their computer security. While some people go into this industry with a computer science background, academic qualifications are by no means a requirement and aptitude is deemed more important. Salaries start at around £35,000 and rise to £90,000 or higher, so this is definitely worth looking into if it interests you.

Advertising

More by this author

James Timpson

Marketeer

Why the Value of Creativity Is Decreasing 30 Things Only Entrepreneurs Would Understand 8 Ways to Boost Employee Well-Being + Workplace Performance 8 Creative Tips to Make Your Wedding Stand Out 5 Awesome Christmas Dinner Leftover Recipe Ideas

Trending in Career Advice

1 9 Tips for Starting a New Job and Succeeding in Your Career 2 10 Essential Career Change Questions To Ask Yourself This Year 3 10 Job Search Tools Every Jobseekers Need To Know About 4 10 Websites To Learn Something New In 30 Minutes A Day 5 If You Have This Key Behavior, You’ll Be More Successful Than 90% Of People

Read Next

Advertising
Advertising
Advertising

Last Updated on June 18, 2019

5 Types of Leadership Styles (And Which Is Best for You)

5 Types of Leadership Styles (And Which Is Best for You)

It takes great leadership skills to build great teams.

The best leaders have distinctive leadership styles and are not afraid to make the difficult decisions. They course-correct when mistakes happen, manage the egos of team members and set performance standards that are constantly being met and improved upon.

With a population of more than 327 million, there are literally scores of leadership styles in the world today. In this article, I will talk about the most common leadership styles and how you can determine which works best for you.

5 Types of Leadership Styles

I will focus on 5 common styles that I’ve encountered in my career: democratic, autocratic, transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership.

The Democratic Style

The democratic style seeks collaboration and consensus. Team members are a part of decision-making processes and communication flows up, down and across the organizational chart.

The democratic style is collaborative. Author and motivational speaker Simon Sinek is an example of a leader who appears to have a democratic leadership style.

    The Autocratic Style

    The autocratic style, on the other hand, centers the preferences, comfort and direction of the organization’s leader. In many instances, the leader makes decisions without soliciting agreement or input from their team.

    Advertising

    The autocratic style is not appropriate in all situations at all times, but it can be especially useful in certain careers, such as military service, and in certain instances, such as times of crisis. Steve Jobs was said to have had an autocratic leadership style.

    While the democratic style seeks consensus, the autocratic style is less interested in consensus and more interested in adherence to orders. The latter advises what needs to be done and expects close adherence to orders.

      The Transformational Style

      Transformational leaders drive change. They are either brought into organizations to turn things around, restore profitability or improve the culture.

      Alternatively, transformational leaders may have a vision for what customers, stakeholders or constituents may need in the future and work to achieve those goals. They are change agents who are focused on the future.

      Examples of transformational leader are Oprah and Robert C. Smith, the billionaire hedge fund manager who has offered to pay off the student loan debt of the entire 2019 graduating class of Morehouse College.

        The Transactional Style

        Transactional leaders further the immediate agenda. They are concerned about accomplishing a task and doing what they’ve said they’d do. They are less interested in changing the status quo and more focused on ensuring that people do the specific task they have been hired to do.

        Advertising

        The transactional leadership style is centered on short-term planning. This style can stifle creativity and keep employees stuck in their present roles.

        The Laissez-Faire Style

        The fifth common leadership style is laissez-faire, where team members are invited to help lead the organization.

        In companies with a laissez-faire leadership style, the management structure tends to be flat, meaning it lacks hierarchy. With laissez-faire leadership, team members might wonder who the final decision maker is or can complain about a lack of leadership, which can translate to lack of direction.

        Which Leadership Style do You Practice?

        You can learn a lot about your leadership style by observing your family of origin and your formative working experiences.

        Whether you realize it, from the time you were born up until the time you went to school, you were receiving information on how to lead yourself and others. From the way your parents and siblings interacted with one another, to unspoken and spoken communication norms, you were a sponge for learning what constitutes leadership.

        The same is true of our formative work experiences. When I started my communications career, I worked for a faith-based organization and then a labor union. The style of communication varied from one organization to the other. The leadership required to be successful in each organization was also miles apart. At Lutheran social services, we used language such as “supporting people in need.” At the labor union, we used language such as “supporting the leadership of workers” as they fought for what they needed.

        Many in the media were more than happy to accept my pitch calls when I worked for the faith-based organization, but the same was not true when I worked for a labor union. The quest for media attention that was fair and balanced became more difficult and my approach and style changed from being light-hearted to being more direct with the labor union.

        I didn’t realize the impact those experiences had on how I thought about my leadership until much later in my career.

        Advertising

        In my early experience, it was not uncommon for team members to have direct, brash and tough conversations with one another as a matter of course. It was the norm, not the exception. I learned to challenge people, boldly state my desires and preferences, and give tough feedback, but I didn’t account for the actions of others fit for me, as a black woman. I didn’t account for gender biases and racial biases.

        What worked well for my white male bosses, did not work well for me as an African American woman. People experienced my directness as being rude and insensitive. While I needed to be more forceful in advancing the organization’s agenda when I worked for labor, that style did not bode well for faith-based social justice organizations who wanted to use the love of Christ to challenge injustice.

        Whereas I received feedback that I needed to develop more gravitas in the workplace when I worked for labor, when I worked for other organizations after the labor union, I was often told to dial it back. This taught me two important lessons about leadership:

        1. Context Matters

        Your leadership style must adjust to each workplace you are employed. The challenges and norms of an organization will shape your leadership style significantly.

        2. Not All Leadership Styles Are Appropriate for the Teams You’re Leading

        When I worked on political campaigns, we worked nonstop. We started at dawn and worked late into the evening. I couldn’t expect that level of round-the-clock work for people at the average nonprofit. Not only couldn’t I expect it, it was actually unhealthy. My habit of consistently waking up at 4 am to work was profoundly unhealthy for me and harmful for the teams I was leading.

        As life coach and spiritual healer Iyanla Vanzant has said,

        “We learn a lot from what is seen, sensed and shared.”

        The message I was sending to my team was ‘I will value you if you work the way that I work, and if you respond to my 4 am, 5 am and 6 am emails.’ I was essentially telling my employees that I expect you to follow my process and practice.

        Advertising

        As I advanced in my career and began managing more people, I questioned everything I thought I knew about leadership. It was tough. What worked for me in one professional setting did not work in other settings. What worked at one phase of my life didn’t necessarily serve me at later stages.

        When I began managing millennials, I learned that while committed to the work, they had active interests and passions outside of the office. They were not willing to abandon their lives and happiness for the work, regardless of how fulfilling it might have been.

        The Way Forward

        To be an effective leader, you must know yourself incredibly well. You must be self-reflective and also receptive to feedback.

        As fellow Lifehack contributor Mike Bundrant wrote in the article 10 Essential Leadership Qualities That Make a Great Leader:

        “Those who lead must understand human nature, and they start by fully understanding themselves…They know their strengths, and are equally aware of their weaknesses and thus understand the need for team work and the sharing of responsibility.”

        The way to determine your leadership style is to get to know yourself and to be mindful of the feedback you receive from others. Think about the leadership lessons that were seen, sensed and shared in your family of origin. Then think about what feels right for you. Where do you gravitate and what do you tend to avoid in the context of leadership styles?

        If you are really stuck, think about using a personality assessment to shed light on your work patterns and preferences.

        Finally, the path for determining your leadership style is to think about not only what you need, or what your company values, but also what your team needs. They will give you cues on what works for them and you need to respond accordingly.

        Leadership requires flexibility and attentiveness. Contrary to unrealistic notions of leadership, being a leader is less about being served and more about being of service.

        More About Leadership

        Featured photo credit: Unsplash via unsplash.com

        Read Next