Why You Should Learn a Productivity System
One of the biggest barrier to productivity in most people’s lives is their resistance to adopting a productivity system. Some read a lot of productivity books and sites like Lifehack and feel like they can take a little bit from here and a little bit from there and call it a day. Others hate the idea that someone like Stephen Covey or David Allen could know their own needs better than they do, and so reject the idea of using “someone else’s” system.
Can’t we just create our own productivity system?
Well, the short answer is yes, we can – or we could, maybe, if we could, but we can’t, so no. The long answer is this post.
What do you do well?
Consider an entrepreneur. Let’s call her “Vita Siddiqi”. Vita imports beautiful silken cloth from Bangladesh for the home sewing crowd. She not only knows all the characteristics that make a bolt of cloth a great bolt of cloth, she knows where and how to get it for the best possible price, how to arrange the shipping to minimize extra costs, and how to market and distribute her cloth so that it ends up in the hands of the men and women who use it, at the most desirable cost and convenience to them.
Go Vita!
Now, do you think Vita should also write her own contracts, do her corporate taxes, design her company letterhead, and hand-print her brochures and catalogs? Should she also harvest the silk, weave the cloth, load it on the ship, pilot the ship to the US, unload it at the docks, and hand-deliver it to her customers?
If you’re a rational person, you probably agree with me that no, she should not. Vita should stick with the things she does well and let other people who are better skilled at those other jobs handle them. Anyone who took every aspect of her business into her hands like I’ve just described would have to be crazy – and wouldn’t be in business very long.
The fact is, all of us have certain things that we have defined as our core competencies and that we’ve learned to do very well, and trust other people with other competencies to handle the stuff we can’t do for ourselves.
Productivity is a Skill
One of the things that’s rarely taught – and is thus largely learned only by those who willingly pursue its study – is the set of skills and habits that lead to effective management of our time, tasks, and attention. It turns out that the mind is quite complex when it comes to matters of productivity, and that few of us have the leisure, background, or desire to pursue the intricacies of the mind, develop a system, test it, implement it, and refine it.
Fortunately, there are some who have chosen that path. Just as David Allen probably shouldn’t do your job, you probably shouldn’t do his – compiling and synthesizing what we as a society have learned about what makes us productive into a set of principles and best practices that anyone can learn.
Systems are systematic (duh!)
Because folks like Stephen Covey have immersed themselves in the world of productivity for years or decades, they’ve learned to minimize conflicts within their systems. While Covey’s 7 Habits may or may not appeal to you, they are at least internally consistent. Covey didn’t grab a little piece from here and a little piece from there, toss it all together with a dollop of his own famous Covey-style dressing, and dish it out.
As I said, the mind is a sensitive thing, and the tiniest of discrepancies can set up a wave of cognitive dissonance that can easily tear our productive lives to shreds. By adopting a tested and refined system, even if it’s not the perfect system for us, we at least minimize those dissonances.
Systems create habits
When we adopt a system, we start learning new habits. The commitment to a new set of principles and behaviors causes us to do things “by the book” and if we stick with it, after a fairly short time we start to follow its precepts automatically.
We can’t get this from “our own” systems, since they’re already built around our existing habits – usually around our unexamined existing habits. They don’t challenge us to stretch out, to explore the real meaning behind the various things we do, or to strive for improvement.
Systems limit options
It’s true, adopting someone else’s system isn’t very creative. It’s not an expression of your deepest self.
Fortunately.
Systems are a little autocratic. Authoritarian, even. They say “my way or the highway” and leave little room for creative experimentation (and fall apart fairly quickly when people start messing with them).
There’s a good reason for this. Assuming you want to do things, having options is the very worst thing. Research has shown repeatedly that when presented with two options, we are very good at maximizing our own self-interest. But when presented with more than two, we experience “decision paralysis” and often will resist acting at all. Which is not the road to greater productivity or greater happiness.
Systems are conscious choices
When we adopt a system, we make a conscious decision to learn the habits and skills set forth in that system. This is quite different from the way we normally pursue greater productivity.
For example, at some point or other you’ve probably experienced the urge to “get organized”. Maybe you came into the office on a Saturday and spent the whole day getting everything neat and orderly, catching up your back filing, clearing your desk of clutter.
But you never ask yourself why you put your files in a certain order, or why you’ve placed your office supplies on this shelf and not that one. Most likely, you cleared your desk by creating a place for all the fiddly little bits that don’t go anywhere at all, without wondering why you have fiddly little bits getting in your way.
In short, you’ve let the same habits and thought-patterns that led to your disorganization in the first place determine the process of getting organized. As if! What you haven’t asked is why you got disorganized in the first place – maybe those books were on your desk and not “where they belong” because where they belong isn’t a place that feels natural to you – it’s too much work to retrieve them when you need them.
Adopting a system forces you to face these tendencies, and to ask “why?” about all the things you do. And if the system is well-designed, it gives you a good reason in answer to that “why?”
Learning a productivity systems teaches productivity
In the process of implementing your chosen system, whatever it is, you learn how to put together and implement a system.
That seems rather obvious, doesn’t it? But think about it – do you really know how to create and implement a productivity system? If you did, would you be looking for advice on being more productive?
That’s nothing against you. Like Vita, you don’t know how to make silk or drive a ship or create a productivity system. But the last, you can learn – by implementing a productivity system. By consciously embracing new, seemingly unnatural and unintuitive habits. By experiencing the way a well-designed system fits together.
In fact, you’re probably learning enough that, once you‘ve implemented a system – whether it’s Allen’s Getting Things Done or Covey’s 7 Habits of Highly Successful People or lesser-known systems like Leo Babauta’s Zen to Done or Nick Cernis’ Todoodlist or anything else – and lived with it for a while, you’ll probably start having a sense of what you need to do to create and implement a system that works better for you.
And that is the real value of these systems – they teach us not only how to be more productive, but what our own specific needs are so that we can be even more productive and, ultimately, fulfilled.
WRITER'S BIOGRAPHY

Dustin Wax
Dustin M. Wax is a freelance writer and project manager at Stepcase Lifehack. He can be reached though his freelancing site at DustinWax.comDon't Be Stupid: A Guide to Learning, Studying, and Succeeding at College.
Follow him on Twitter: @dwax.


Comments
Patrick is Very Evolved says on January 22nd, 2009 at 1:04 pm
I would equate a productivity system to nothing more than having a business plan.
The most essential thing to using either successfully is that you just start using them! The second most important thing is that you don’t become rigidly attached to your plan – it must evolve and change as you or your circumstances change.
Patrick
mike walzman says on January 22nd, 2009 at 4:09 pm
It is all a learning process. I feel like for me, all this productivity stuff can be wayyy to much and actually distracts me. Maybe I’m just not in a place where I need so much structure, I don’t know. For me the old to list works just fine. The thing I need to work on is sticking to the to do list and not getting side tracked. (like reading this blog, ha) Thanks for the tips : )
Alex Fayle | Someday Syndrome says on January 23rd, 2009 at 6:12 am
I believe in systems, but I don’t think there’s a one-size-fits all solution. Everyone has slightly different ways of approaching things and of ordering information. What works for one person is a complete nightmare for someone else.
I believe that the systems like GTD or Covey are great but once the basics are mastered to tweak the system to fit with who you are.
Vincent says on January 24th, 2009 at 2:35 am
Having a productivity system really helps us in getting things done, but one man’s meat is another man’s poison. So maybe sometime when one system does not work on another, it will be good to tweak it to make it work for them.
Cheers
Vincent
Personal Development Blogger
Productive Pinoy says on January 25th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
I like what you said that productivity is a skill. And like any skill you can continue to grow it.
Daniel John
Yes, But Still... says on January 25th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
There’s some recent scientific evidence showing that construing a task in concrete (vs. abstract) terms reduces procrastination.
Perhaps our productivity systems are changing the way we think about our work, resulting in our increased productivity.
Tancrède says on January 26th, 2009 at 3:16 am
Consider the case of Benjamin Rush (see wikipedia about him), a 18th century doctor who tried to cure yellow fever by using leeches. The treatment made patients generally worse, but he was confident that the treatement was good, because he explained the bad outcomes by the context, but good outcomes where surely due to this marvelous treatement.
The point is, productivity is an art, perhaps less than an art, and certainly not on the same level as physics or maths. Generally the only evidence we have is that the guru (there is a reason he is called that way) has used and applied it and it was generally useful. But Benjamin Rush thought that too. There is a evidence problem in productivity (it is discussed at the academicproductivity blog).
I am not saying that Allen, Covey, etc. have no idea what they are talking about. I am just saying that what they do is just organizing common sense ideas and “hacks”, and they are much more on the same footing as the rest of us, than are our doctors, plumbers, etc. My attitude toward that is to take it as it is: as good or bad suggestion, not to be taken without a serious grain of salt, and to take whatever seems to work. When someone come with some real data about a hack (like the blocked learning trick, or Dr Sylvia’s book about How to write a lot) then I am prepared to take him/her more seriously.
Allen seems to realize that when he say something like “what most people get from this is good tricks”. This pragmatism is much needed: nobody can at the present time to be the Pasteur of productivity, someone providing a systematic remedy to our problems that is demonstrated to be effective.
Demian Turner says on February 14th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
We just released a new and free web productivity app
http://dorisapp.com/
A simple approach to task management – let us know what you think.
Harry Che says on December 2nd, 2009 at 2:57 pm
For a simple approach to track goals, and to be more productive, you may want to check out http://www.GoalsOnTrack.com, a very nicely built web app designed for tracking goals and todo lists, and supports time tracking too. It’s clear, focused, easy to navigate, worth a try.