Why You Should Kick the “Versus” Habit
A world painted only in black and white is a hard place to live or work

In our time-starved, action-obsessed approach to work and life, we easily drop into the habit of seeing every choice or decision in terms of simple opposites: good versus bad, right versus wrong, success versus failure, winners versus losers. Every choice must be one or the other, with no options in between. Macho management thinking is full of such false dichotomies.
This makes for a tense and uncomfortable workplace, as well as a warped view of reality. Worse still, it produces that habitual “us versus them” mentality, which destroys relationships, undermines co-operation, and slowly renders us paranoid.
A world of self-induced paranoia
The urge is strong today to reduce everything to simple, “A versus B” choices. Essays and self-expression are replaced in schools by multiple-choice questions. Forms come full of boxes to check and sentences to be “crossed out where not applicable.” What we wish to say is reduced to choices between what others have already decided is appropriate (or acceptable).
Such an attitude makes life less complicated — no subtleties to produce those annoying and confusing shades of gray — yet destroys it too; for in a polarized world, those who are not for you must be against you. There are only friends or enemies, allies or “evil empires.” What you choose to believe in, and the actions you embrace as “good,” must not — cannot — be questioned or faulted. There are no neutrals, no possibility that you — yes, you — may be mistaken. Those who choose another way are, by simple definition, wrong — too wrong even to contemplate what might be learned from them.
In the name of profit, speed, and efficiency, we tear up centuries of human thought. In the pursuit of “getting things done,” we lay aside our capacity for wonder and our curiosity for other ways.
The workplace as melodrama
Encouraged by the media, who love simple oppositions and melodramatic confrontations (witness The Apprentice), we demonize “the opposition” or “our competitors” and praise ourselves, “the good guys,” with thoughtless extravagance.
In a bad novel, every circumstance becomes a life or death struggle, without a balance or subtlety. In a similar way, many leaders today assume every decision is important, simply because polarized thinking makes each appear so stark: winning or losing, support or opposition, love or hate, eager agreement or hostile condemnation, blind loyalty or base treachery.
And so, like ham actors, leaders “chew the scenery” of their workplaces in emotional paroxysms over the smallest setback, or fly into extravagant joyousness at the least triumph. When winning is all that matters, losing becomes an unthinkable horror. No space is left to honor those who have done their best, yet still fallen a little way short. They are lumped together with all the others in the simple category of “failure.”
Choosing to stay blind to our folly
As we dwell lovingly on the defects in “the other guys,” treating them as stereotypes at best (or downright stupid, evil, or dishonest at worst), we set ourselves free from the need to reconsider our own assumptions. There may be equal or even greater problems in the “right way” that we have chosen, as there are in the “wrong way” that they follow, but we will never see them — until it is too late. Our simplistic viewpoint cannot stay in place and allow this to happen.
Why do so many corporations blunder into crazy ventures, then cling to them in defiance of sense? Why do leaders make it a test of loyalty for their subordinates to applaud every action, no matter how ill-advised? Why do people make truly bad career choices, then stick with them for years?
The answer is as sad as it too is simple: because there are, in their self-constricted minds, no acceptable alternatives. Because there are only two ways: what they have chosen and what has therefore to be, by definition, undeniably worse.
Getting back to reality
The reality of this world is that all extremes are uncommon to the point of invisibility. They aren’t just scarce; the more extreme they are — absolute good versus absolute evil, unquestionably right versus undeniably wrong — the more likely that they exist only in theory, if at all. Daily life plays out somewhere in the middle, between whatever extremes you care to name. This world, whether we like it or not, is a world of countless overlapping options and choices. In place of the black and white simplicities we try to impose upon it, there are nothing but the subtlest shades of gray.
How to kick the habit of over-simplified thinking
- Slow down and recognize with Oscar Wilde that truth is “never pure and rarely simple.” Take your time to unravel at least some of its complexities. Subtlety and ambiguity are the first casualties of haste and short-termism.
- Be endlessly wary of convenient simplifications and false certainties. There are many people happy to tell you that they know the “one, right answer.” Why shouldn’t you believe them? Because no such answer exists. They are deluding themselves — and will delude you too, if you let them.
- Question, question, and question some more. Questions aren’t dangerous, answers are.
- If you are presented with an “A or B” choice, don’t take it, if at all possible. Synthesize these extremes to see the options that lie between them. Human creativity arises from taking things that first seem to be irreconcilable opposites, then discovering all the ways in which they work together.
- Whenever you think you have found the complete and final answer, lie down in a darkened room until you come to your senses. Every answer is provisional — every one. What you have found may be the best you can do at present, but that doesn’t mean that you won’t find a better one sometime; or that others haven’t found a better way already.
- Ambiguity and uncertainty are your friends. They encourage you to go on searching. They try to save you from betting everything on what you know today. People treat them as enemies because they undermine our pompous and self-righteous belief in “certainties.” Yet, the greatest risk anyone can take is to imagine that they already know what’s most important.
Only by slowing down and taking time to question and think — really think — shall we return to dealing with business reality, in place of those simplistic, misleading, cardboard-cutout, Hollywood melodramas we are becoming used to putting in its place.
Photo credit: Nils Tubbesing
WRITER'S BIOGRAPHY
Adrian
After graduating from Cambridge University, Adrian's career spanned local and national government, a series of corporate executive positions, and a partnership in a global consulting and business services firm, from which he retired as CEO of their US consulting arm. He runs two blogs: Slow Leadership and Slower Living and has published two books on the practice of leadership.
ARTICLES BY THIS WRITER »


Comments
Josef Wells says on May 7th, 2008 at 10:41 am
Great post. We live in a very grey world. Which is the right gray, who can know.
Marelisa says on May 7th, 2008 at 11:49 am
Life would certainly be a lot easier if the good guys wore white hats and the bad guys always wore black hats. However, life is much more colorful than that, as the author of this great post explains.
sharad says on May 7th, 2008 at 12:43 pm
Great post! I’m a huge fan of your posts, and usually end up sharing them via google reader.
As a consultant, my current client is an extremely “melodramatic” workplace. While I’m doing what I can to slow down and embrace greyness, is there anything I can do to influence my client or the rest of my team?
Adrian says on May 7th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Josef, I’m glad you enjoyed the article.
You too, sharad.
Maybe one way with your client might be to point out how much being melodramatic costs in time and energy. All that running about and emoting! It’s also a great way to let mistakes creep in.
Most organizations want to save on waste and following your good advice could be a way for them to do just that.
B Smith @ Wealth and Wisdom says on May 7th, 2008 at 3:41 pm
Great post. I find that the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. The challenge is to get everyone to step back from their positions and look at the big picture. If you get both sides focusing on the desired outcome, a solution appears.
That being said, I believe we need to explore our belief systems. We need to understand it deeply so we can deal with more than black and white. While the world is shades of gray, good and evil do exist. It is when we don’t understand our beliefs that the gray is hard to deal with.
Sharad-Chances are that your customer’s culture drives the melodrama. You probably won’t be able to change this. What you can do is change your view/beliefs/behavior. Depending on the change, this may or may not be acceptable. Sometimes you have to fire a customer, not because they are bad, but because your organizations are not a fit.
Ann says on May 7th, 2008 at 10:49 pm
I’m definitely in support of seeing and appreciating subtleties, but it is possible to get stuck in the gray, unable to make a decision or move forward.
What has worked well for me in terms of problem-solving and/or getting “unstuck” is to enroll the help of someone who is a black and white thinker and work on the problem together, each with our unique way of seeing and solving.