Look for the Solution within the Problem

Two prisoners dug a tunnel from their cell 80 feet to escape from prison. Where did they hide the dirt? This is one of the examples used by Roni Horowitz of the consultancy group SIT to show the advantages of a method called Systematic Inventive Thinking (SIT).
The answer is that they hid the dirt in the tunnel. The prisoners stole nylon sacks from the prison bakery and each day they dug the tunnel and put the dirt into the sacks. At cell inspection times they pushed all the dirt bags back into the tunnel and tidied the cell. When the prisoners escaped the guards found a cell full of bags of dirt and an empty tunnel.
It is a good example of one of the principles of SIT – look for the solution within the problem or its environment. The prisoners had very limited resources – but one of them was the tunnel itself.
If we are given unlimited resources to solve a problem then we can always come up with something – and often it is expensive and over-engineered. When we have to use the limited set of resources contained in the problem and its immediate environment then we are forced to be more creative – and very often the result is a solution that is elegant, inexpensive and effective. Using the tunnel is a prime example.
When Hiram Maxim went pigeon shooting he noticed two problems. One was the strong recoil of the rifle into his shoulder. The second was that he had to stop to reload the gun. He wondered if it was possible to use one problem to solve the other and by doing so he invented the machine gun.
At the end of the first Gulf War fires were raging out of control in the Kuwaiti oil refineries. What could be used to put them out? One answer might have been sand. But a better solution was found. The pipelines that were normally used to pump oil from the refineries were used to pump water to the refineries. By using an existing resource and reversing the flow the problem was overcome.
Engineers are accustomed to working in very constrained conditions. In the very early Volkswagen Beetle car there was a problem of how to provide the power needed for the windscreen washer. The ingenious solution that the engineers came up with was to use the air pressure from the spare wheel (which was in the front of the car) to power the water jet.
But it is not just product engineers who can use internal resources in ingenious ways. In 2005 the IRA pulled off a major robbery at the Northern Bank in Belfast – they got away with £25m in banknotes. How could the authorities catch the criminals or stop them using the proceeds of their crime? They came up with a clever idea using one of the resources within the problem – the stolen banknotes. They changed the currency in Northern Ireland and reprinted all bank notes. Anyone holding old bank notes had to bring them in to be changed – and that is a big problem if you are holding millions of stolen banknotes.
So how can you use this approach in your problem solving? One of the methods taught in Systematic Inventive Thinking is to break the problem down into a chain of unwanted effects. Now consider in turn each element in the problem or its environment and say to yourself – this element can be adapted to stop one of the unwanted effects and to break the chain. Then come up with ideas. By rigorously and imaginatively applying this technique you will often find an inventive solution.
WRITER'S BIOGRAPHY
Paul Sloane
Paul Sloane is an author and speaker on leadership, innovation and lateral thinking. His most recent book is The Innovative Leader. He helps organizations improve innovation, creativity and leadership. He is the founder of Destination Innovation. He has written 15 books of lateral thinking puzzles and hosts the lateral puzzles forum.
ARTICLES BY THIS WRITER »


Comments
Tara Kelly says on March 14th, 2008 at 9:10 am
Fabulous advice.
Steve says on March 14th, 2008 at 9:49 am
Great advice but the tunnel solution wouldn’t work for several reasons:
1) This solution means every time they wanted to dig in the tunnel they had to take the time to unload all the sacks of dirt, dig some and then reload all the sacks of dirt before being discovered. The tunnel is 80 feet long! There will be hundreds of sacks of dirt by the time they get to 60 or 70 feet of tunnel. How can two guys possibly move those sacks back and forth and still have time for inspection.
2) Where are they supposed to get so much material for the sacks without attracting attention?
3) There will be sacks of dirt left over. They will not be able to pack the dirt into the sacks and the sacks into the tunnel with the same density as the dirt itself because the sacks will not fit as tight. There will be airspaces. There will be sacks left over.
So much for their wonderful example. I hope their methodology is better than their use of thought experiments.
Jacki Hollywood Brown says on March 14th, 2008 at 10:04 am
I LOVE thinking like this. If someone can present me with an organizing challenge on a tight budget (or NO budget)….that is my dream!
Robert Bardou says on March 15th, 2008 at 12:11 am
You have shown excellent examples. I have had often to use the limited resources and to find a way out of difficult provisions with minimum losses.
Noel says on March 16th, 2008 at 5:36 am
The currency is still £ Sterling in Northern Ireland, it never changed; Northern Bank banknotes were (eventually) reissued under a different design. Banknotes from First Trust bank etc. were unaffected.
Sav says on March 19th, 2008 at 5:45 am
this is a great article. Thanks.
I got this in my email last week:
Case 1
When NASA began its space program, they found that pens don’t work at zero gravity (ink won’t
flow down to the writing surface). To solve this problem, it took them one decade and $12 million.
They developed a pen that worked at zero gravity, upside down, underwater, in practically any
surface including crystal and in a temperature range from below freezing to over 300 degrees C.
And what did the Russians do?
They used pencils.