You Want Engagement? Then Start Being Clear!
How to keep the wheels turning even when you aren’t looking…
The Problem: you want your staff to go the extra mile. You want your team to take some risks. You want your employees to ‘get the big picture’ and do what it takes to make it happen. You want the wheels to stay on the bus even when you aren’t there.
What you want is engagement. But no one’s buying. If you want something done you have to spell it out in detail, or just give up and get to that ugly “I’ll just do it myself” place of the defeated manager. You feel like every time you turn your back, the wheels come off the bus again. You’ve got zero engagement.
Engagement was defined by John Gibbons (writing for the Conference Board) as “a heightened emotional connection that an employee feels for his or her organization, that influences him or her to exert greater discretionary effort to his or her work”. Notice the line from emotional connection to greater discretionary effort.
Discretionary effort is the phrase that describes what every employer wants: for the employee to figure out what is needed for success in the bigger picture, and to do whatever is needed to get there – without anyone standing over their shoulder… Stuff just gets done.
So how do you get your team to this place? What do we require to become fully engaged? In my experience, three things are needed: clarity, hope, and commitment.
Clarity
In his book The One Thing You Need to Know… Marcus Buckingham writes that the one thing you need to know about great leadership is “Discover what is universal, and capitalize on it.” Buckingham tells us that what is universally required of leadership is clarity. Specifically, an optimistic clarity about the future.
We’ll work our hearts out for you (that’s discretionary engagement) if you can make us see with crystal clarity the great future we are all headed for.
Leadership is the work of leaders. That means get out front and lead. You must see what others cannot yet see. You must see the future with an optimistic clarity that inspires others to follow. Leadership does not just require clarity; leadership is clarity.
If you can’t see the future more clearly and more optimistically than the rest of us, what makes you a leader?
Hope
If there is clarity about the future, then the next link in the chain is possible: hope.
Hope, as I have defined it, has two components: an optimistic vision of the future, and the belief that we have what it takes to get there. As a leader your clarity of vision creates the precondition for that kind of hope. We must see where we are going, and we must believe it is a place worth getting to, before we decide to invest our blood, sweat, and tears to get there! The success of every great religious leader, every reformer, every leader of any expedition across any ocean or continent has been dependent on their clarity of just how much greener that grass over there is.
When we can see that where we are headed is better than where we are now, clarity becomes hope.
Great managers play a critical role in inspiring hopefulness in teams. With their defining work in understanding the strengths of every employee (Buckingham again), great managers help us understand exactly what our role is, and leverage our strengths in achieving the goals of the organization. Great managers support our contribution by constantly encouraging further growth where they know we are strong, and by giving us opportunities to use those strengths for the greater good.
Great managers act as match-makers between our strengths and the jobs that need to get done. The result, when all is right, is that powerful feeling of a team that is firing on all cylinders, and every member is clear about their role in the success of the overall project. And like so much in life, success builds more success: feeling like we are successful contributors to the greater good, and being part of a successful initiative, builds the confidence and hopefulness that leads to more success.
When clarity and true hopefulness exist in an organization, the stage is set for the third component of total engagement: commitment.
Commitment
When our leaders give us clarity and hope about our futures and the future of the organization, the stage is set for us to make a commitment. Starting on a journey of change and growth requires clarity and hope. But there is no journey at all without commitment. Commitment is the action piece. It’s time to start walking. Commitment is, to paraphrase Nike Corp., ‘just doing it’.
If organizational change sometimes feels like going over a cliff, then clarity is envisioning just how we will make the tricky descent, and hope is the confidence we will make it to the bottom in one piece. Commitment is taking the first step over the edge. Commitment is the point at which there is no turning back.
If clarity is the domain of leadership, and engendering hopefulness the domain of great managers, commitment is the responsibility of the whole team. Literally, if clarity and hopefulness are the call, commitment is the response. We are all going over the edge together, and my commitment as a team member is that I will take that first step with everyone else, and every required step after it, until we reach our goal.
Now we have engagement.
So you want complete engagement? Give us complete clarity. Don’t complain that you can’t get anyone involved/engaged/committed in your project, your vision, if you can’t help us see it. Do your job as a leader, or we will wander off somewhere else. Require that our managers provide the kind of intelligent feedback and empowerment that strengthens our confidence in ourselves and in the organization we work for, or we will falter and lose our commitment.
Do you want your employees to tap into that mysterious ‘discretionary effort’ that means the wheels stay on the bus even when you are out of the building? Then make sure that you have done your part to be clear, and to connect our strengths with the task at hand. If you’ve really done your part, then you’ll get passionate engagement and everyone will take that first step towards extraordinary growth and change together, and then keep on walking!
WRITER'S BIOGRAPHY

Clemens Rettich
Clemens Rettich is a coach supporting business and leadership clients on Vancouver Island. With a degree in music and an MBA in Executive Management, and careers from artistic director to international marketing, Clemens brings a rich web of experience and passions to his work. Check out his web site at clemensrettich.com.
ARTICLES BY THIS WRITER »


Comments
fildawg says on May 8th, 2009 at 9:49 am
Great article!! Too many in management or “leadership” roles try to use positional authority to mandate engagement.
timgray says on May 8th, 2009 at 10:49 am
You cant dictate engagement. you have to encourage it. Too many times I have seen failures at management use the “rule by fear” method. These people have no clue and really should not be managing people.
MY tools to get engagement are rewarding excellent performance. Yes, reward people above and beyond. Dave stayed late to get the project done? dont say “that’s your job”, you take him to lunch the next day. You bring in doughnuts or bagels for the staff.
If they love working for you, then they will make sure the wheels stay on the bus. If you have a problem with keeping the wheels on the bus, you need to figure out now why your management style is failing.
Clemens Rettich says on May 8th, 2009 at 11:01 am
fildawg,
You got it. Two of the biggest ‘-al’ failures in management and leadership: situational and positional. The second one is a particular kicker with younger employees, they won’t tolerate it if it isn’t backed up by a real skills and true caring. Transactional leadership.
Clemens
Clemens Rettich says on May 8th, 2009 at 11:04 am
timgray,
Exactly. Leadership by fear is about the biggest oxymoron I can think of in this context! Lets make people afraid to follow me! Management by fear is the same thing. Great management is rooted in great relationships and, as you say, fueled by understanding and encouraging strengths and great behaviour. Fear has no place there.
Clemens
Anelly says on May 11th, 2009 at 2:58 am
I thing rewarding is a way to engage employees but is not the only thing. The work environment and the co-workers are also an important issue in this situation.
Nels Pedersen says on May 11th, 2009 at 10:13 am
Clemens – thanks for the great article. There’s plenty of good information and wisdom here. For those interested / serious about employee engagement, I would invite you to check out our community employeeengagement.ning.com/. We have a strong and growing membership committed to sharing information on this subject.
James says on May 11th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
There is a balance that must be struck. At the end of the day the “leader” or “manager” is still the BOSS. Fear is not appropriate, but folks still have to know that you retain the final word because you are ultimately responsible for success or failure. Your accept the failures but you should never own the successes….your team owns those. Too often we are so focused on creating perfect relationships with employees they often forget who’s paying them and expect a friendship versus employer/employee.
Clemens Rettich says on May 11th, 2009 at 11:50 pm
Anelly,
You are quite right about the very important role of the organizational environment in supporting engagement. I address a part of that in this blog: http://clemensrettich.blogspot.....art-2.html
Clemens Rettich says on May 12th, 2009 at 12:13 am
Nels,
Thank you for the comment and the support. I checked out the Employee Engagement site and think it is excellent. I also passed on the link to an HR specialist I work with.
I look forward to following your site!
Clemens
Clemens Rettich says on May 12th, 2009 at 12:35 am
James,
You are right. There has to be a balance. That said, if you want acceptable, rule-following performance then reminding people you are the boss and that you sign the cheques is fine. If your business values commodities ahead of creativity and relationships, this is appropriate.
My clients, and the organizations looking at truly extraordinary performance in the brave new world we are heading into, don’t believe this is even close to enough. Check out Richard Florida’s work for the context I am working in here. We need complete engagement, the willingness to take risks, and commitment that enables teams to follow their leaders to the very brink, well outside their comfort zone. In the new economy, nothing less will do. And bosses and paycheques just cannot trump real leadership and team engagement in getting there.
Clemens
Brandon R Allen says on May 12th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
Great post. One of the biggest issues I see with businesses that I work with is clarity and getting the team to see where the business is going so everyone can work together going forward.
Clemens Rettich says on May 13th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
Brandon,
Thank you. Clarity is absolutely the prime directive of leadership. You can’t ask people to follow if you don’t know where you are going!
Dave says on June 11th, 2009 at 12:35 pm
What about the reverse? When you’re an engaged employee who works under management that’s not engaged?
Is there a way to transfer that engagement upward?
Clemens Rettich says on June 13th, 2009 at 12:00 pm
Dave,
That is truly tough. Without knowing the specifics of what the symptoms of the disengagement are, or the specific network or management structure that surrounds the individual, it would be hard to comment.
As a starting place I would certainly look at traditional game strategies in considering an ‘approach’: direct, end-run, lateral. Direct would be seeking to understand each others stances through direct conversation. End-run would be going around the individual to leverage the power of a superior or peer of that person in getting change. Lateral would be stepping out from under the management to align de-facto responsibility of projects, initiatives, etc. through another department, etc. A fourth option of course is to leave. That kind of voting with your feet is what generated Gallup and Buckingham’s work in the first place!
If you are describing your own situation, I really do wish you the best. It can be a difficult and frustrating position to be in. When task/positional responsibilities are not in alignment with leadership’s support or the appropriate amount of authority to get the job done, I have seldom seen that end in a win-win resolution.
Clemens