June 9th, 2008 in Featured, Lifestyle

Getting Rid of Guilty Pleasures

Guilty Pleasures

We all have activities we love or foods we crave that we think of as “guilty pleasures”, things that aren’t good for us, or that we feel would embarrass us if anyone else know about it, but that we enjoy anyway.

Maybe you like reading “airport novels”, or chick lit, or true confessions. Maybe you love double-fudge chocolate chunk ice cream with chocolate sauce and chocolate sprinkles, or gummy worms, or expensive imported truffles. Maybe you cry in cheesy romantic comedies, or obsess over 1960’s B-movies, or scream like a little girl in slasher pics.

Whatever it is, your pleasure is tempered somewhat by guilt. Some guilty pleasures make us feel guilty because they’re so bad for us — fattening foods, time-wasting games, IQ-sucking sitcoms. Others aren’t necessarily bad for us, but we fear for the effect on our reputations if word got out. They make us look “low-class” or “non-intellectual” or “unprofessional” or “immature”.

The guilt ultimately arises, though, from the pleasure itself. Our modern society, with it’s “work work work ethic” and deeply-bred commitment to constant self-improvement — through dieting, through “extreme” sports, through self-help books, through a never-ending stream of products and media that all promise a “better you!” — holds pleasure in rather low esteem. It is seen, at best, as a reward, though a somewhat disreputable one, for the success of all that work work work.

But more often it’s seen as a luxury, and a dispensable one at that. The poor are held in contempt for their continued willingness to own DVD players, the rich for their decadence. Food, we are told, is solely for the nourishment of the body; sex, we are told, is solely for the reproduction of the species. Pleasure for pleasure’s sake is to be avoided, and those who seek it are to be shunned.

Hence the guilty pleasure — the thing we do just because it makes us feel good. It’s shameful to seek after the “empty calories” of the sugary snack, fluffy novel, or childish hobby. It’s a betrayal of the fundamental principles our society is built on.

It’s time to strike the phrase “guilty pleasure” from your vocabulary.

The idea that those things that distract us from the “real” work of living should be held in contempt is, of course, good for those who profit most from our work, but it’s no good for the rest of us. Work is good, of course — things need to get done — but work without pleasure is for automatons, not human beings. Indeed, it is the “guilty pleasures” we should feel least guilty about, because they re the things in which we are more fully our own people.

Behind the concept of the guilty pleasure is a demand for conformity. Don’t eat that, watch that, read that, do that, be that. It is an insistence that there are certain things we’re supposed to eat, watch, read, do, be, if we are to be taken seriously as adults. It is an insistence, in fact, on being “normal” — or even worse, “average”.

I defy that.

I hear you thinking, “But certainly, if something’s unhealthy for you, and you do it anyway, you should feel guilty about it — it’s the only way you’re gong to stop!” And sure, if your diet consists solely of guilty pleasures, if your reading is entirely guilty pleasures, if your life is consumed by the quest for ever-more guilty pleasures, that’s a problem. If your guilt stems from your concern over a lack of willpower or discipline that is causing you real harm, you absolutely should be dealing with that. It’s probably not the guilty pleasure that’s to blame, though — you need to work out some balance in your life as a whole.

But more often, our guilty pleasures are an exception, a small part of a life that’s otherwise already well-balanced. Which is to say, you can probably afford to indulge in a guilty pleasure or two without any guilt. If it gives you pleasure and isn’t likely to kill you, by all means, dig in!

Same thing with the rest of the guilty pleasures. If your guilt stems from the fear of what other people would think if they knew, and you’re no longer in middle school, you need to deal with your lack of self-confidence, not your appreciation of Top 40 music.

As with so much else, it boils down to a question of balance. If your life is chugging along just fine, thank you, and you just happen to have an inordinate fondness for Troll dolls, I say know yourself out. On the other hand, if your eating habits or entertainment preferences leave you unprepared to deal with your life — or if they’re the only consolation in your life — you need to give some serious thought to discovering more nourishing pleasures — or building a more nourishing life.

WRITER'S BIOGRAPHY

Dustin Wax

Dustin M. Wax is a freelance writer and project manager at Stepcase Lifehack. He is also the creator of The Writer's Technology Companion, a site devoted to the tools of the writing trade. When he's not writing, he teaches anthropology and gender studies in Las Vegas, NV. He is the author of Don't Be Stupid: A Guide to Learning, Studying, and Succeeding at College.

Follow him on Twitter: @dwax.

ARTICLES BY THIS WRITER »
Don't want to miss any related posts like there? Subscribe to our feed!

Comments

  • B Smith @ Wealth and Wisdom says on June 9th, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    Dustin-I like the post. We hear too much about how we need to work harder and eliminate fat/chocolate/sugar/etc from our diets. Anything that isn’t healthy or productive is bad.

    It isn’t the food or activity that is bad, it is how we do it. Is it a simple pleasure that we enjoy in moderation? Has it become a driving need or an addiction?

  • Shanel Yang says on June 9th, 2008 at 12:26 pm

    Wow! I never thought about it that way! But, then again, I have that weird ability/limitation to see the background before the foreground (literally). I always thought that the term “guilty pleasure” was a term of endearment and was actually a good thing. But I have been way off the mark before; and, now that I’ve read your post, I think I was again wrong again about this one, too.

    I wonder if there are some harmful guilty pleasures, though, like career-bashing jokes that are still funny and, thus, enjoyable. I’m working on a list of lawyer jokes for tomorrow’s post, and, though I’m a little shocked at the harshness of some of these jokes (and wonder if some of my readers will be offended), I’m going for it anyway because I think they’re funny. Besides, I’m a lawyer, so maybe that makes it less offensive? Am I just turning on my own kind? I don’t know. Isn’t that the point of guilty pleasures? As long as I’m not even sure if it’s good or bad for me or anyone else, why not indulge?

  • Ann at One Bag Nation says on June 9th, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    I posted a while back about overdosing on self-improvement, and the need to lighten up!

    Having said that, I think the guilt in guilty pleasures often comes from indulging in them when we haven’t done the work we committed to first.

    I know I enjoy mindless TV or relaxing with a glass of wine much more when I know I’ve had a productive day.

  • logic says on June 9th, 2008 at 4:24 pm

    I like the sentence ’strike the phrase “guilty pleasure” from your vocabulary’. Guilty pleasures are the small things that let us deal with the big things in life, that we do not want to do but still have to.

    Thank you for all the great posts!!!

    http://thinkneat.blogspot.com

  • eoh_nl says on June 9th, 2008 at 6:16 pm

    Great post again. Thought you had lost it with the “puntuality” post, but this one, with the “break all the rules” post makes up for it. Ofcourse we are striving for perfection. Because we are supposed to. And being perfect makes you feel great. But every now and then you just have to be imperfect… i.e. just be human. And all those cracks in that perfect “machine” makes us what we should be: a good human.

  • Dustin Wax says on June 9th, 2008 at 8:10 pm

    Shanel: I think there are lots of pleasures that are indeed bad for us, but the trick isn’t to eliminate the pleasure but to examine the life in which doing something bad for you is a pleasure — and, often, deciding whether the harm outweighs the pleasure. Smoking, drinking, fatty foods, etc. are all at some level “bad for you” but all offer pleasures that for many outweigh the risks — if you’ve embraced that, there’s no need for guilt.

    It is true that “guilty pleasures” is sometimes used endearingly, though it’s always with a sense that one shouldn’t be doing it (often, the guilt itslef is part of the pleasure). I guess what I’ve said here can’t apply to *everything*; I was aiming more for the self-knowledge and individualism aspect of guilty pleasures than an all-encompassing approach to everything ever labelled “guilty pleasure”.

  • Trevor @ Limorefe says on June 10th, 2008 at 3:58 am

    I totally agree that this is related to society’s general “work ethic”: any pleasure that doesn’t requie work (physical or intellectual) is somehow “bad”. Chocolate, game shows, pulp fiction, etc.

    As you say the key is balance. A little indulgence can be emotionally healthy, too much can lead to problems. Unfortunately the idea of a happy balance is one with which society has trouble.

  • website design says on June 10th, 2008 at 1:49 pm

    Like eating a bowl of snacks and watching The Girls Next Door. Guilty guilty guilty.

Post your comment

Continue your discussions at Lifehack Community.

Get your own Avatars at Gravatars.
Three FREE Audiobooks RISK-FREE from Audible
Recent Writers SEE MORE
Latest Poll

Do you like the new design?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...