Study Tip: Why Aiming for A is Better Than A+
Is it better to get an A or an A+? Most people instinctively react with an A+. As I’d like to show in this article, that isn’t always the case. Being perfect can cost far more than good enough. Also, as I’d like to demonstrate, the habits that might get you an A+ might also leave you with a B or C if you fail to optimize.
I’ve never been a perfectionist. I’ve always been aware of the costs of going beyond good enough. Despite this seemingly poor attitude towards work, it hasn’t hurt me in the slightest. By optimizing instead of attempting perfection, I’ve managed to maintain a grade hovering between an A and A+.
How Optimizing Works
The traditional studying approach is to learn everything perfectly and with equal force. I believe this approach will only lead to a nervous breakdown.
An optimizing approach says that learning everything perfectly is impossible. However, by investing more time on critical details and less time on unimportant ones you can get a better grade with less time invested.
Isn’t All Information Important?
Importance is relative. Sure you might be tested on it, but will knowing something make up 5% of your test or 50%?
To get you started with the optimization process, here are some tips:
1. Identify the testing bias.
A test is a device used to gauge your understanding. All tests invariably have bias, where they emphasize certain concepts or types of understanding over others. Go over past tests and ask yourself what biases are shown in the tests. That can form your template for learning.
2. Quality of Time Spent Ratio
Look at your course outline and the various percentages given to different assignments. Divide that number by how much time you need to get your desired grade. The result is a Quality of Time Spent Ratio. When time becomes tight and you need to make a choice, always use your ratio to see where extra time gets placed.
Example: Your running out of time and you have three projects to do. The first is worth 5% of your grade and you expect 2 hours to get the grade you want. The second is worth 20% and you expect 15 hours to get the grade you want. The third is worth 30% and you expect 10 hours to get the grade you want. Your quality ratio’s are:
- Project One: 5%/2 =2.5%
- Project Two: 20%/15 =1.33%
- Project Three: 30%/10 =3%
Extra time spent on the third project is likely to have the biggest rewards for your final grade. Don’t use this approach dogmatically as there are other factors to consider (mark cut-offs, differences in marginal benefits, etc.). However, this method be a rough way to decide where to put your time.
3. Reading Emphasis
If I asked you to recite your entire textbook from memory, could you do it? Could you do it even with a 50% accuracy rate? In both cases you probably couldn’t. Then how, if you don’t know the words in your textbook, can you pass the class?
The answer is that some words and meanings are more important than others. Certain ideas are critical, others are supporting details. Some ideas form the foundations and others are just extra facts.
When reading through a textbook, form a priority of information in your mind. Flag important information, but more importantly, assess the degree of importance. Simply using a highlighter might not be enough if you’re unable to distinguish between an idea that forms the basis for a test and one that only accounts for one question.
4. What’s the point?
What should you be able to do/understand after your course is finished? Use this question as a shorthand for prioritizing what needs to be learned. The beauty of this method is that most instructors give you the course purpose on the first day. You don’t even have to look for it!
Example: Financial Accounting teaches you to prepare financial statements for shareholders as well as understanding company financial statements.
From this brief purpose statement, your goal is to connect everything you do to this broader point. Periodically ask yourself how some fact or detail you learn applies to that broader goal. Don’t learn things in isolation, expand and connect with the broader purpose of learning.
5. Cutting Classes and Skipping Chapters
I don’t recommend skipping class. But there are exceptions to every rule. I got two A+’s in courses that I only went to a quarter of the classes. I recognized early on that the material covered in class was simply repeating what could be learned in the textbook. Some students benefited from the repeated exposure, but I didn’t.
Cutting out entire assignments, classes or chapters is normally a bad move in a school setting. Usually the marginal benefit of just showing up exceeds reinvesting the time elsewhere. Instead, most your optimization is about where to place extra time. Where do you put the extra hour when you have several different places to put it?
If time isn’t an issue for you, then optimizing isn’t necessary. Just finish every project with the same zeal and enjoy the rest of your time off. But most people I know don’t have that luxury. Inevitably you need to make trade-offs. Optimizing often means making choices to aim for A rather than A+.
WRITER'S BIOGRAPHY

Scott H Young
Scott Young is a university student who writes about productivity, habits and self-improvement. Scott has been featured on the Be Happy Dammit! Show.
ARTICLES BY THIS WRITER »


Comments
Jeffry Gonzalez says on November 20th, 2007 at 10:49 am
The Oscar winning film editor, Walter Murch (English Patient, Apocalypse Now, Cold Mountain, etc.) has a large brass letter “B” on his wall where he works. He shoots for a “B”. He says, and I paraphrase, that in that business, the best you can hope for (on your part) is getting a B. It is a collaborative business, and so much depends on a million other variables beyond your control. With three Oscars, he at least seems to “accidentally” get an A occasionally…
Jeremiah - Simpletiger says on November 20th, 2007 at 5:25 pm
Very interesting. I always felt this way even back in high school in biology class. You should study the vocabulary, effects, and main points.
I like this post!
Vishal Jariwala says on November 20th, 2007 at 6:31 pm
Very interesting and useful article. I wish I had come across this before starting my Master’s! But I am sure that this will be of help to me in my current and future affairs.
I think excellence is a by-product of an optimized and confident preparation.
plonkee says on November 21st, 2007 at 3:42 pm
Of course, this implies that you are merely studying towards the test, and we wouldn’t want that now ;)
When I was at uni, I missed loads of lectures in the first year in part, because none of it counted towards my final grade. I only had to get 40% (class average 55%) to pass.
rruben says on November 21st, 2007 at 4:43 pm
Good article but this is how I look at it from a 80/20 principle approach;
(In my country, Holland, you can have a mark between 1 ( very bad) and 10 (perfect))
A 10 is good but inefficient.
An 8 is good and efficient.
A 7 is good but you did not understand the core fully.
A 6 means that you did not put enough time in it and did not learn well.
Off course not looked at how difficult a test can be.
KC says on November 23rd, 2007 at 12:06 pm
Really great read, but i’ve always been one that aimmed for the top. Optimizing is great, really it is, but i can’t stand the feeling of knowing that i could have done better, so i’m going to stick with my ways.
jonathan Peterson says on November 26th, 2007 at 7:33 pm
I had a college roommate who graduated with a perfect 4.0. He was the absolute master of managing his time investment, taking non-core classes pass fail and squeeking by, skipping one class to study for another test, etc.
I’m sure that everything averaged out would have been a 89.4999999
I probably worked 95% as hard and got a 3.2 or something.