Mice, Antelopes, and Your To-Do List
You are a wolf. At your job, you spend much of your day chasing, capturing, and eating field mice. At the end of your busy day, you feel exhausted but strangely unfulfilled. Why? Because the energy required to catch a field mouse is greater than the caloric content of the mouse. You can’t live on a diet of field mice. Trying to do so eventually results in starvation.
As a wolf, what you really want to eat is antelopes. Antelopes are big. Capturing one might require careful advance planning, cooperation with other wolves, and a full day of intense, focused hunting. Maybe even two or three days. But an antelope, when killed, provides you and your family a royal feast that can sustain you for a week.
The difference between the value of mice and antelopes is important when we think about our our daily to-do lists. If we spend our days chasing and eating field mice, we will enjoy the satisfaction of busy activity and short-term accomplishment. And we will get nowhere.
If, on the other hand, we spend our days pursuing antelopes (our most significant, highest payoff projects), we may need to plan better, work smarter, and wait longer to see the positive results of our efforts, but those results will move our organizations and our careers forward in measurable, even quantum ways.
Are you a mouse hunter, or an antelope hunter?
“The simple fact is that being busy is easier than not. Responding to each new request, chasing an answer to the latest question, and complaining about overwhelming demands are easier than setting priorities.”
– Heike Bruch and Sumantra Ghoshal, A Bias For Action
Rob Crawford, a school administrator who loves baseball and acoustic guitars, writes on productivity and impact at Crawdaddy Cove. He thanks Tom Suddes at For Impact for the idea of the mice-antelopes metaphor.



Comments
Jay Perry says on February 16th, 2007 at 11:47 pm
I think one of the biggest benefits of GTD was helping me to even be able to see the possibility of the antelope.
It was amazing, after working GTD for a couple of weeks, how much clarity I had about the big picture. I realized how much of my stuff I shouldn’t even be doing (that would be better for me to delegate).
But sometimes you just want a nice little, tasty field mouse snack.
Thanks for the great analogy.
J
Marc Moss says on February 18th, 2007 at 11:03 am
Thanks for the *attempt* at a great analogy. The flaw in the analogy is that pronghorn antelope are difficult to catch. I live in Montana, and have seen them in action.
According to Wikipedia, “The Pronghorn is built for maximum predator evasion through running; its speed is surpassed only by that of the cheetah. It can sustain high speeds longer than cheetahs, however. The top recorded speed was 61 mph (98 km/h).” I’ve personally seen pronghorn run pretty freakin’ fast.
Wolves would rather dine on slower animals such as elk, bison, moose, caribou, and deer.
So chasing pronghorn antelope would be *more* inefficient than eating field mice because more energy would be expended to catch one, and it would take more wolves to cagtch one, so that the payoff would have to be divided between more members of the pack, thereby lessening your nutritional intake.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.....g_and_diet