
There is not much point in having brilliant ideas if we cannot persuade people of their value. Persuasive debaters can win arguments using the force of their reason and by the skillful deployment of many handy techniques. Here are some general dos and don’ts to help you win arguments together with some sneaky tactics to be aware of.
Do:
- Stay calm. Even if you get passionate about your point you must stay cool and in command of your emotions. If you lose your temper – you lose.
- Use facts as evidence for your position. Facts are hard to refute so gather some pertinent data before the argument starts. Surveys, statistics, quotes from relevant people and results are useful arguments to deploy in support of your case.
- Ask questions. If you can ask the right questions you can stay in control of the discussion and make your opponent scramble for answers. You can ask questions that challenge his point, ‘What evidence do you have for that claim?’ You can ask hypothetical questions that extrapolate a trend and give your opponent a difficulty, ‘What would happen if every nation did that?’ Another useful type of question is one that calmly provokes your foe, ‘What is about this that makes you so angry?’
- Use logic. Show how one idea follows another. Build your case and use logic to undermine your opponent.
- Appeal to higher values. As well as logic you can use a little emotion by appealing to worthy motives that are hard to disagree with, ‘Shouldn’t we all be working to make the world better and safer for our children?’
- Listen carefully. Many people are so focused on what they are going to say that they ignore their opponent and assume his arguments. It is better to listen carefully. You will observe weaknesses and flaws in his position and sometimes you will hear something new and informative!
- Be prepared to concede a good point. Don’t argue every point for the sake of it. If your adversary makes a valid point then agree but outweigh it with a different argument. This makes you looked reasonable. ‘I agree with you that prison does not reform prisoners. That is generally true but prison still acts effectively as a deterrent and a punishment.’
- Study your opponent. Know their strengths, weaknesses, beliefs and values. You can appeal to their higher values. You can exploit their weaknesses by turning their arguments back on them.
- Look for a win-win. Be open-minded to a compromise position that accommodates your main points and some of your opponent’s. You cannot both win in a boxing match but you can both win in a negotiation.
Don’t:
- Get personal. Direct attacks on your opponent’s lifestyle, integrity or honesty should be avoided. Attack the issue not the person. If the other party attacks you then you can take the high ground e.g.’ I am surprised at you making personal attacks like that. I think it would be better if we stuck to the main issue here rather than maligning people.’
- Get distracted. Your opponent may try to throw you off the scent by introducing new and extraneous themes. You must be firm. ‘That is an entirely different issue which I am happy to discuss later. For the moment let’s deal with the major issue at hand.’
- Water down your strong arguments with weak ones. If you have three strong points and two weaker ones then it is probably best to just focus on the strong. Make your points convincingly and ask for agreement. If you carry on and use the weaker arguments then your opponent can rebut them and make your overall case look weaker.
Low, sneaky ways that some people use to win arguments:
- Use punchy one-liners. You can sometimes throw your opponent out of his stride by interjecting a confident, concise cliché. Here are some good ones:
- That begs the question.
- That is beside the point.
- You’re being defensive.
- Don’t compare apples and oranges.
- What are your parameters?
- Ridicule and humiliate your opponent. This can be very effective in front of an audience but will never win over the opponent himself.
- Deliberately provoke your adversary. Find something that makes them angry and keep wheedling away on this point until they lose their temper and so the argument.
- Distract. Throw in diversions which deflect the other person from their main point.
- Exaggerate your opponent’s position. Take it way beyond its intended level and then show how ridiculous and unreasonable the exaggerated position is.
- Contradict confidently. Vigorously denounce each of your opponent’s arguments as fallacious but just select one or two that you can defeat to prove the point. Then assume that you have won.
Remember that an argument between two people is very different from a debate in front of an audience. In the first you are trying to win over the other person so look for ways of building consensus and do not be belligerent in making your points. In front of an audience you can use all sorts of theatrical and rhetorical devices to bolster your case and belittle your adversary. In these circumstances humour is a highly effective tool so prepare some clever lines in advance.
















I would be interested in some ways to counter the “sneaky” tactics.
Another sneaky tactic is “that depends on your definition of X” This is easy to see through, though, and can leave you open to a counter-attack if you don’t use is carefully.
Great post. These tactics work if both parties use facts as the basis of their arguments. It becomes more difficult to have a rational discussion with someone who argues from an emotional point of view. The classic statement what about the children is a perfect example. No matter how many facts you bring to bear it is almost impossible to overcome the gut wrenching feelings this invokes.
Great post! Sneaky argument tactics is at the heart of many marriage problems. I wrote about the 4 worst kinds, defensiveness, stonewalling, criticizing, and showing contempt in my article “4 Signs that a Marriage Will End in Divorce” at http://shanelyang.com/2008/03/23/4-signs-that-a-marriage-will-end-in-divorce/ I also focused on logical persuasive argument techniques (as well as listing 26 bad arguments) in my article “How to Think Like a Lawyer” at http://shanelyang.com/2008/06/09/how-to-think-like-a-lawyer/
I heard of a hilarious punchy one-liner to help you get out of a really heated controversial topic from a stand up comic. It was even funnier b/c he’s Korean (like me). He said if you ever get cornered by someone who wants to argue abortion or some other topic that you just don’t feel like discussing at the moment and you can’t possibly win, just wait for them to demand your opinion (which they always eventually do), then look at them with as serious a face as you can muster, then emphatically say, “I don’t know, but the last time I checked, this is still America!” then walk off immediately and confidently. : )
You say that both can win in a negotiation. This is true, but a discussion/argument is NOT a negotiation.
The only reason to have an argument about something is to find the truth. The only way for the truth to be found is to be objective in only accepting a correct conclusion. If you compromise in order to end the argument on friendly terms, you are working against the very reason for such an argument in the first place.
“The only reason to have an argument about something is to find the truth. The only way for the truth to be found is to be objective in only accepting a correct conclusion.”
Well said, but I would go further: if the only way you can “win” the argument is to fall back on sneaky tactics, semantic obscurity and rhetorical hooha, then you’re not trying to find the truth of the matter, you’re only trying to win.
If you can’t accept, let alone admit that you might be wrong about the issue, even in part, then the argument is a lost cause to begin with.
Yawn, I still like the ole club across the head routine! Works for me all the time.
JT
http://www.FireMe.To/udi
The “sneaky tactics” are just fallacies. It was interesting enough I guess, but this feels like an intro to debating. A bad intro.
These are the worst pieces of advice I have ever heard about conduction successful discussions.
“Ridiculing your opponent infront of an audience”?
This will instantly ridicule yourself to anyone with an IQ over 101.
“Find something that makes them angry and keep wheedling away on this point until they lose their temper”?
“Calmly provoke your foe”?
These tips might work in the kitchen of a local McDonald’s but in the professional world you will get laughed at. People will instantly see through you.
What about active listening? Summarising? Extending? Disclosing? Conjoining?
Please study successful discussion techniques from better sources.
[...] How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics – Stepcase Lifehack: “How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics” [...]
loudest person wins, period.
[...] July 8, 2008 How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics – Stepcase Lifehack [...]
[...] How to win Arguments [...]
else
if “talking to woman, throw all this out the window”
Reminds me of this (much funnier) article from many years ago:
http://www.digitalroom.net/index2.html
Here is the link:
http://www.digitalroom.net/humour/argument.html
If all rules of a relationship could be summarized as well as a debate, the world may be an easier place!
Some good vice in this post!
Another tactic I often employ is one I refer to as “Making them run over their own tracks”. I draw my opponent on their view further and further, making them extend their point beyond their base of support (evidence, logic, etc.) and then subtly turn them and have them contradict the points they have earlier raised.
If discussions are like Judo, this is the kick-flip – make your opponent come at you and then use their momentum against themselves.
Quite helpful tips and quite down to earth as well. In day-to-day life we do come across many people using Low, sneaky ways to win an arguments as well.
the do and don’t tips are also helpful.
[...]In the DO department Sloane suggests a few things that may seem like old news to many of us (who have been arguing since the womb) but a refresher course is always in order. He reminds us to stay calm, “If you lose your temper,” he says, “you lose.” Ask Questions, something we all know about, Know Your Opponent, and Try for a Win-Win. All great pieces of advice when dealing with conflict in general[...]
http://frumhacks.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-to-beat-your-chevrusa.html
If your objective is to win the argument and not demolish the person entirely then looking for a way to let the other person “save face” can be good too. Offering them a way out while you still win will let them keep some of their dignity while still acknowledging your argument was right.
Jack, and others – remember this is an article about how to WIN an argument. If you’re in it to win, for political reasons or otherwise, you must use all tools available to you. In some political arenas, this is called pulling an “Ivan.”
How to win arguments:
4. Use logic
I love how simple this is :P
[...] How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics (tags: Life Hacks Communication) [...]
[...] How To Win Arguments (@ lifehack) Lifehack presents the dos, dont’s and sneaky underhanded ways to win an argument. A great read, especially if you’re an attorney. [...]
[...] How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics – Stepcase Lifehack [...]
[...] This is good stuff to know. [...]
[...] How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics [...]
[...] Paul Sloane(著)frank01(译) 译文出处:译言 [...]
[...] Sloane原文题目:How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics译者:frank01 [...]
[...] Оригинал статьи [...]
You should not use the sneaky tatics. This only disproves you to everybody around you and makes you seem desperate. Sneaky tatics are just asking for your opponent to turn them on you and leave you open. You must have proof and facts to back you not simple ideas or general conceptions. This is my view but otherwise is was okay. I say okay to mean that it isn’t horrid but it could still do with a bit of work.
[...] January 8, 2009 in Uncategorized [...]
[...] How to win arguments [...]
[...] How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics [...]
“Jack says on July 8th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
These are the worst pieces of advice I have ever heard about conduction successful discussions.
“Ridiculing your opponent infront of an audience”?
This will instantly ridicule yourself to anyone with an IQ over 101.
“Find something that makes them angry and keep wheedling away on this point until they lose their temper”?
“Calmly provoke your foe”?
These tips might work in the kitchen of a local McDonald’s but in the professional world you will get laughed at. People will instantly see through you.
What about active listening? Summarising? Extending? Disclosing? Conjoining?
Please study successful discussion techniques from better sources.”
I completely agree Jack. While some of these things might help you win an argument, trying to win is in itself a failure. And these tactics are sick, manipulative and sure to make you as many enemies as possible. If you are willing to make enemies so thoroughly, then you will not last long in the business world.
Do: research your arguments. And, I would suggest Debatepedia for this: It’s “the Wikipedia of pros and cons”.
http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Welcome_to_Debatepedia!
[...] How to win Arguments – Dos, Don’ts and Sneaky Tactics – “There is not much point in having brilliant ideas if we cannot persuade people of their value. Persuasive debaters can win arguments using the force of their reason and by the skillful deployment of many handy techniques…” [...]
When I prepare to negotiate, provide a service or turn my employees’ talent into performance, I know deep down that if I make people feel valuable they will see my input as having value. But in that moment when they are just hands-down, across-the-board dead wrong, I sometimes can’t stop myself from letting them know how incredibly wrong they are. When that happens, my ability to influence them vaporizes on the spot, and I’m left dealing with the response I created by making them wrong.
Nice post, Paul! And I think this might be the first board in the history of the universe with comments by completely independent "Garth"s. I hate to be a troll, but I just blogged about how to use classical logical fallacies to brain punk your way to success in any argument with your spouse or significant other–it's at http://www.garthsundem.com or you can search my name at Science20.com or PsychologyToday.com.
Again, nice post, and I'm sorry to suggest a link out, but it's so relevant that I couldn't resist!
Cheers,
Garth
do you even know how sad this page is
Very effective and practical tips though I personally feel that we should avoid purpsosely trying to be ‘sneaky’.
A thunbs-up!!
If it is so SAD why are u reading it
Thumbs up for this!!!
“What are your parameters?
Let’s see”
Here’s a rebellious/ironic idea… Let’s start an argument using the many tips above ladies and gentlemen XD
I fail to see the point.