
I teach things that many find offensive. Whether it’s articles containing racist language in my “Gender, Race, and Class” course or descriptions of oral insemination as part of the Sembia male’s coming-of-age rituals in my anthropology course, I know that some students are going to be offended, sometimes deeply.
Over the years, I’ve come to view offense as a particularly useful state of being – but only when the offense one feels is used properly. Most people view being offended as an excuse for shutting down, even going (you guessed it) on the offensive. They refuse to be party to whatever offensive material is being presented to them, whether it’s someone making a sexist joke or a politician’s attack ad.
Obviously I can’t have students shutting down – or worse, feeling so put upon that they lash out at me or their fellow students. My classroom is, after all, a learning environment. But being offended is one of the key parts of the learning process. It is through taking offense that we discover the limits of our own knowledge, understanding, or compassion, and therefore it is at the point of offense that we have the greatest potential to grow as people.
Consider the kinds of situations that make us feel offended. We take offense when:
- We are confronted with situations radically different from those we’re used to.
- We experience situations that conflict strongly with our own values.
- Our belief systems are challenged or dismissed as inadequate.
- We are labeled or otherwise treated in ways that are inconsistent with our self-image.
All of these situations can offer us an opportunity to grow as a person, whether by learning about value systems or ways of living that differ from your own (and which sometimes offer a more efficient, more fulfilling, or simply more reasonable way of doing things), or by increasing our understanding of other people (offering the opportunity, perhaps, to resolve conflicts before they become intractable), or simply by exposing the gap between the way others see us and the way we see ourselves (which can be eye-opening indeed).
This can only happen, though, when we recognize offense for what it is – our mind’s way of processing unfamiliar experience. We have a whole set of mental standards that our minds are always comparing new experiences against to guide our actions and reactions; when no “entry” exists that we can categorize some situation into, offense kicks in – “this is wrong,” it says.
At that moment, we can act in ways that prevent growth – attacking someone, condemning them, walking away, or becoming defensive – or we can use that offense as a trigger to kick us into “understanding” mode. Try thinking about these points next time you’re offended:
- Offense is not injury. The most important step to keeping a level head in the face of serious offense is to remember that just because something offends you doesn’t mean that it hurts you in any way. Be careful to sort out your immediate, emotional response from the actual practical effect of whatever offensive situation you’re confronting – most of the time, you’ll find your life can go on just fine regardless of this offensive thing.
- People aren’t stupid. For the most part, people do things for reasons that, at least at the time, seem like good ones. And when they have the weight of tradition behind them, they’re usually right – societies that do things that are actually and truly wrong tend to be extinct. No matter how difficult it is to accept, you have to acknowledge that many practices that seem utterly impractical and stupid have endured for hundreds or even thousands of years without killing, maiming, or traumatizing the people who practice them.
- There’s more than one way to skin a cat. The way you do things will always seem like the right, best, and only way to do it – but it’s not. Try to recognize the value in the way other people do things – often you’ll find that, as odd and offensive as it might seem at first, it actually manages to accomplish the same ends as your “right” way of doing things.
- You’re pretty weird yourself. Never forget that to an outsider, everyone seems weird. We are always exactly as foreign to others as they are to us. Try to look at some of your practices from the outside and see just how weird you really are.
- Clarify, clarify, clarify. Since offense usually arises at the point of misunderstanding between two people, cultures, or social contexts, dampen your moral outrage for a second to ask some questions. Although asking a question or two might seem easy, in my observations it takes a great deal of courage to ask even the simplest questions – we all want to protect our self-identity by refusing to look ignorant, vulnerable, or unprepared. But of course, we often are ignorant, vulnerable, or unprepared – and sometimes all three. Make sure you actually know what’s going on!
- Those shoes are tight. You know the saying “Before you judge someone, walk a mile in their shoes”? Well, it’s one of those sayings that are actually pretty true. Try to see things from other people’s viewpoints – and often enough, the offense just melts away.
Of course, there are situations where immediate action is necessary, as for instance when people are being injured. But a lot of us end up with a “think first, justify later” attitude that causes more conflicts than it solves. Welcoming offense as an opportunity rather than a problem is a step towards reducing the conflict around you – by any measure, an entirely non-offensive thing!
















This is a great way of thinking about offense, as a sure-fire sign that we probably have some kind of an adjustment to make to our attitudes or opinions.
It seems to me like the people who are offended most often are probably the least likely to use it to learn or adjust their attitudes. It is a great trigger for expanding one’s understanding if they think of it at the time. Good post.
As a teacher myself, I’ve encountered situations where I was accused of NOT being offended, and I could never explain myself satisfactorily. But it was a gut feeling which prevented me from taking any harsh action, and instead talk and get to know better. Thanks for your post, now I can notice some “method in my madness”.
I do have to take issue with one point in this otherwise fascinating article: social practices that maim and traumatize (and sometimes even kill) people can and do persist for generation upon generation. As long as they leave enough people to reproduce and continue the practice, the practice continues.
Just as in evolution, not every trait is adaptive. Some just continue to exist because they don’t do quite enough damage for natural selection to eliminate them.
http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/2008/05/28/101-being-offended/
Here’s an alternate take on being offended.
Dias: Fair enough – perhaps I overstated that. The point is, things that look dysfunctional from the outside often make perfectly good sense from the inside, so it pays to make an effort to understand them. That’s true even if, in the end, your initial offense evolves into an activist resolve to put an end to some practice or another. Reformists who act from offense rarely do any good, and often cock things up even worse than they were to begin with.
Being offended has become our national pastime. The immediate access some people have to intense retaliation and hostility astonishes me. The idea to “get over” being offended so easily is good. Perhaps it should be part of school curriculum in early education. Being gracious never hurts and could also be a valuable skill to teach anyone.
Not sure I see any value in being intentionally rude or offensive. It is our nature and that may be what we are here to rise above.
Some people are sensitive and the emotional damage of feeling offended or attacked can be devastating. Repeated offenses doesn’t always make it better or easier for them. We are unique individuals and handle what comes our way differently.
I agree with your article on matters that are not related to race, but I don’t think racial slurs are something that should be brushed off and just “gotten over.” Usually racial slurs are meant to offend and hurt. Being the victim of many racial taunts and words, I’ve felt the sting too many times.
There is an obvious difference between someone making a comment about, say, your clothing and getting offended, versus someone making a comment about the color of your skin.
Excellent points, Mr. Wax. I generally am easy going, but do take offense when presented with certain situations. After reading this post I can more readily understand why I get irritated and have some useful tools to help deal with better understanding of other’s point of view. My concern is that, while I will enter an engagement open to understanding why a particular activity is done in such a manner not every encounter will involve equally understanding parties. If only one side of the offense is willing to participate in understanding I do not see resolution to conflict. What I potentially see is guilt by accosiation and being equal only in the flogging recieved by the offended crowd.
Just my two cents…and probably worth both pennies.
Brian: I’m not saying that no action is ever needed — I’m saying that acting out of pure offense is usually counter-productive and stupid. Beating someone up because they offended you, even if they used a racial slur, doesn’t do anything to end racism — if anything, it perpetuates it. Now, you can’t always engage someone either, and frankly it isn’t the joob of minorities to go around educating non-minorities on their own shortfalls of character. But recognizing the source of and import of the offense can go a long way towards suggesting a more productive course of action.
You make some very interesting points, but I’m not sure “unfamiliar” covers every reason for being offended. (I’m not denying the validity of the points you make, just pointing out offense is more complex than you describe it.) For example, I have read extensively on the history of the Holocaust – the most horrific details are no longer unfamiliar to me. Yet Nazi ideology never fails to offend me – on a very basic level, that type of destructive hatred is wrong. It would be nice if it could be dealt with by some means other than conflict – and in the case of a few individuals, that may be possible – but for those truly committed to the “ideal”, I’m afraid unyielding opposition is the only sane response.
Of course, as you pointed out, that level of wrongness is self-destructive; the swift destruction of Nazi Germany was in large part self-inflicted. Still, look at the harm they did in the few short years they were in control. Yes, truly horrific practices have a way of bringing down the society which will not give them up, but I’m not sure that process is swift enough.
Ray: I’m pretty sure Nazi Germany counts as an occasion where the ongoing injury (and killing) of persons merits an immediate response! Without that injury, of course, Nazism is just a twisted fantasy — surely you don’t feel the need to bomb the old jerk at the end of the bar crying into his beer stein on Hitler’s birthday?
Intersting,I like it.Thanks.
It happens myself to be a person that feels offended very easily. But i learned during time that not everything must be regarded as an offense and more that that, as you said, this does not necessary hurt you.
This is a really good post. I think to get clarification when feeling offended makes a big difference and helps put situations into the appropriate context.
I don’t think I get offended too easily, but it’s taken me a while to get to this point. When I hear something potentially offensive – or something that would have offended me previously – not only do I learn something about myself, but there’s a lot to learn from the other person as well. There are many times I’ve learned about other people’s fears and motivations through their offending comments.
Great post and well put.
Judging is a big part of being offended. Going into any situation with preconceived notions is a recipe for trouble, with mild or extreme consequences.
Be open to new things and your life will be much more fulfilling!
Dustin: No, I’m not going to bomb anyone because they’re crying into their beer on Hitler’s birthday. The word “conflict” carries a lot of meanings, and physical violence is just one of them. Even in the case of one old jerk enjoying a twisted fantasy, where clearly no violence is necessary, I still think it is important to remember – and express – how outrageous such a fantasy is. Why is that? If it were just one old jerk, lost in his own sick thoughts, it wouldn’t be important, of course.
In fact, there are many more people, young and old, who still believe in that twisted fantasy than any sane person would imagine. Do I think they should be bombed? No – not unless they resort to violence, then I support the government doing whatever is necessary to stop that violence. But, do I think they should be vehemently opposed? Yes, for two reasons. First, it helps discourage anyone who isn’t deeply committed to keep from getting involved if they see many people find those beliefs so offensive. Second – and most important – it reminds us of a line which must not be crossed. Yes, it is tempting to presume the twisted fanatics who dream of “purifying the race” (a concept so absurd it would be laughable if it were not for the tragedy it has provoked) will never again be in a position to act on their beliefs. Yet, if you study the rise of the Nazi party in Germany, that is exactly what a lot of decent people thought then. They assumed it was unthinkable such ideas could ever gain widespread support, so they refrained from opposing them – until too late.
As I said before, I’m not disagreeing with your basic ideas. There is a lot worth considering in there. I merely think, in the course of simplifying the topic to make your point, you left out the possibility there might be an idea so offensive it should be opposed under all circumstances. The type and degree of opposition ought to be proportional to the threat, of course. But if we don’t regard some twisted fantasies as requiring unrelenting opposition, we risk making the same mistake decent, intelligent people made while it might still have been possible to halt the Nazi rise to power. And such opposition, which need not have been violent originally, would have been far better than what occurred – a massacre on a scale no human mind can imagine, necessitating a violent response that, alone, did more harm than any early opposition to the NSDAP could possibly have done.
[...] course, there are situations where immediate action is necessary, as for instance when people are being [...]
Great post. George Carlin believed this was the job of the comedian, to go past the line so that you forced people to think. As Carlin said: “I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.”
I find it quite problematic that you use racist language as one of your examples here. Part of the function of racist language is to dehumanise and other POC so that their oppression by physical violence and other means is more readily accepted, so no, racist language is not something that doesn’t cause injury. It is part of a framework of white supremacy whose goal is to privilege white people while (directly or indirectly) causing POC injury.
Not to mention that many POC are already forced to learn almost exclusively about white culture whilst their own cultures are erased or appropriated by white people and white-controlled systems, so your solution of: use this opportunity to learn more about the culture of the person offending you, is redundant and kinda ignorant.
I think it’s key to remember that not being angry/defensive/whatever in the face of racist language is a privilege white people have because many of us don’t even see most racism let alone be affected by it, whereas POC deal with racism and its consequences daily. International Blogs Against Racism Week has a lot of posts on POC anger as a valid response to racism if you’re interested in further reading that could help you deal with this issue better in your race classes http://delicious.com/ibarw/anger
cp (and Ray): Yes, language can be used to cause injury, and in that case must be opposed. But a) offense at language can often distract from much more serious problems, and b) racial language that offends does not always represent conscious racism.
Consider: in the SOuthwest, where I live, a black person is very unlikely to hear a racial epithet aimed at her or him by a white person. A huge set of social controls have developed among white people in the wake of the civil rights movement, so that even racists are not likely to use overtly racial language. More importantly, white and black people simply do not interact very much here, reflecting a whole set of underlying structural issues that are, in effect, much more damaging than offensive language.
Where a black person is much more likely to hear racial epithets directed at them is in relation with Latinos. Relations between black and Latino populations in the Southwest are so bad that many prisons have been forced to segregate (which is a huge problem in itself). Race riots break out at minority schools with some regularity, even at the jr. high level. These animosities do not represent one group holding another down (at least not directly) but two groups competing for the same social ground. I submit that understanding and patience are *exactly* what a person in this context needs, no matter how deeply offended s/he may be, because it is in the constant cycle of offense and counter-attack that *both* groups are restrained by the interest of now whites so much as of power in general. That is, blacks and Latinos are not naturally enemies, and have more to gain by understanding each other than by taking offense — but as long as they take offense, someone neither black nor Latino wins.
None of this, of course, is to endorse offensiveness. I’m just tired of people investing their own sense of offensiveness with supreme authority, especially when it contributes to an escalating cycle of misunderstanding and conflict. Note that I never say it’s wrong to challenge offensiveness — I say it’s wrong to let being offended shut down the channel of communication, because everyone loses when that happens.
We get offended because of our headspace – and really nothing else. So if you say to me that Pele was the best soccer player all time, but i’m a george best fan, then if i get offended it’s because of my opinions. Once we reach the stage of understanding that all views are opinion, be they written or verbal, should help us all cope with offense so much easier.
I partially agree, but some of this is dead wrong. Societies have survived for thousands of years while literally maiming people, as well as figuratively maiming them by forcing people to be in menial positions. Similarly on a personal level, some offense is triggered by people who are attempting to put you in a category they don’t sincerely see you in, but are publicly trying to damage you. Sometimes shutting down is the right response, at least until emotional urges pass so the situation can be dealt with intelligently.
You know, I TOTALLY agree that we as a nation have become too easily offended. That’s how thought-crime/hate-crime legislation gets passed. There’s too many people out there that think that if you disagree with them or think they’re wrong, then you must hate them and are willing to infringe on your freedom of speech to make sure that they don’t have anything brush past their ears that they might not like.
That having been said, I can’t agree with all of this post. Some points of contention:
1) Yes, there actually are plenty of stupid people out there. Some through basic genetic reasons (no fault of their own) and some simply out of laziness. That doesn’t mean they’re less valuable, but let’s call a spade a spade, here.
2) Just because someone else’s value system or perception of you is different, doesn’t mean it’s invalid, but likewise, it DOES NOT make it equally valid. There seems to be this weak-minded paradigm that is too cowardly to see that is such a thing in this world as truth. It’s not “my truth” and “your truth” because they can’t both be true.
3) Not all offense is bad. Personally, I like the fact that we took offense at the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Great commentary piece! Very logical and well written. I’ve been on both sides: knee jerk reacting as well as logically thinking things out to come to a reasonable conclusion. I think with age comes understanding.
I wrote a piece similar to this, and it deals with things inline with this commentary piece. Check it out if you have the time:
Question of a LifeTime: Somebody Says “N@gger”, what do you do?
http://tinyurl.com/dhgpgw
this pretty much explains why political correctness has gone way too far
Why is criticism considered with negative connotations?…
Criticism appears to be the greatest gift one may bestow upon another if the other is truly interested in growing and discovering a heightened self-awareness. It appears that people frequently take things personally and leave situations gravely offende…
Would you be offended if I pointed out that I find “there is more than one way to skin a cat” a deeply insensitive, and an unnecessarily cruel idiom? Why would you want to skin a cat?
I completely agree with the first point at the bottom. “Offense is not an injury.” I go by the old saying, “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.” I take it a little further emphasizing that anything anyone does that does not affect my life directly or me in any way does not in damage or hurt me. The information is irrelevant. Just for an example say a homosexual couple gets married in Iowa. To me, that’s irrelevant news in all regards. I don’t care lol. But someone else who for some reason is strong against homosexual marriage feels offense. That is what I am trying to understand by searching the internet. Why does that person feel offense, and what exactly does that feel like? Do they feel homosexuals are the enemy and any good they have is offensive? Racism is another subject like this. It’s been scientifically proven that no race is superior to another, how can one believe in racism?