September 18th, 2008 in Communication, Featured

6 Tips on Critiquing Without Melting Down

I had a senior-level writing course when I was in college. The first thing the professor told the class was that if any of us didn’t think we could handle honest critiques of our work, we should leave. Nobody did, of course, but over the course of the semester a few of my classmates wished they had. It wasn’t that the professor went out of his way to be mean, but his critique style could pretty well convince a student that their writing was simply awful. I remain convinced that if my professor had just made a few small changes to his critique style, he wouldn’t need to warn incoming students about critiques.

Offering constructive criticism is surprisingly hard to do. There’s this balance you have to strike between working to improve the project at hand and not absolutely bashing the creator of that project. It’s made worse by the fact that when we critique, we’re almost always looking at something subjective: there is no right way to judge a job performances, a short story or a user interface.

1. Comment on what’s right

In every peer critique I’ve ever experienced, the teacher or leader has made a point of instructing the group to comment on the things they like about th work in question. On the surface, it seems like this instruction is just an effort to keep everyone’s feelings from getting hurt. But there is a purpose to commenting on what’s right with a project: after a critique, it’s entirely possible for the creator to throw out everything and start from scratch. It’s a fact that most criticism focuses on what’s wrong with a project — that means there’s almost no feedback telling the creator what is worth keeping.

2. Ask why

Every project has some sort of limitations from size to color to kind. When the person responsible for the project asks you for feedback, she may forget to mention those limitations. When you launch into a critique, though, she’ll get frustrated because you don’t understand the limitations she was working with. I’ve seen it happen — and been guilty of getting frustrated in this manner — more times than I care to count. The only way to avoid it — unless you have a list of the limitations in your hand — is to ask why the creator went with a certain tactic.

3. Focus on the general

We don’t always catch every typo before we go looking for a little feedback on our work. And while it’s great if we get a critique that deals with a few technicalities, it’s not nearly as valuable as a critique that focuses on the piece as a whole. When you’re giving feedback try to ignore the technical errors and focus on the big picture: in a performance review, for instance, how Bob interacts with customers is far more important than how he shakes a customer’s hand. Sure, the handshake could be improved on, but it’s better to have a great overall interaction with the customer than focus on that little detail.

4. Brainstorm fixes

If you’re giving a critique, you have no obligation to explain how to fix the project in question. It can be helpful for the creator to hear some suggestions, but telling the creator that there’s only one way to fix it doesn’t often help. Instead, making the effort to talk through a couple of possible solutions — brainstorming a few fixes — can help the creator quite a bit.

5. Offer an honest opinion

As we try to avoid being too critical, we run the risk of not really explaining what we think of a given project. If we don’t actually tell a project’s creator what our honest opinions are, what’s the point of a critique at all? While I’m not encouraging you to seek out every little fault, I do think it’s important to tell the recipient of your critique where you struggled with the project, what seems like it could be improved and what you think other people will have problems with — as well as what you like about the project.

6. Leave it to their judgment

No matter how fabulous your advice is, the person who’s work you critique may choose to ignore it. It’s his or her project and choice on how to change it. I’d recommend avoiding all the variations on “I told you so” you can think of, as well as ignoring any urges to ask for a critique of your critique. Unless you are asked for further feedback, consider yourself done when your initial critique is over.

Building Your Critiquing Skills

Critiquing is a skill, just as much as any other aspect of communication. Considering how often we’re asked for our opinions on something, it seems worthwhile to develop the skill to give an opinion without getting everyone in an uproar. While I’d love it if some people would just identify a little less with their work, the truth is that many people take critiques very personally and it takes a deft touch to help them improve a project without everything ending in tears. Whether you’re participating in critique sessions for your company’s next big marketing campaign or you’re headed off to the local writers group, think about how you can give a great critique. How can you really help the person asking for your feedback improve their project?

WRITER'S BIOGRAPHY

Thursday Bram

Thursday Bram blogs about a variety of topics, from personal finance to small business. She is the author of an upcoming book on the tools and tricks you need to build a career you can take with you during long-term travel. More information about Thursday and her book, Working Your Way Around the World, is available on her personal site, ThursdayBram.com.

ARTICLES BY THIS WRITER »
Don't want to miss any related posts like there? Subscribe to our feed!

Comments

  • Vincent Le Pes says on September 18th, 2008 at 11:12 am

    I hate to be critical ;) but I only see six tips…

  • Teresa says on September 18th, 2008 at 12:04 pm

    I do a lot of critiquing in my writing group and I live and die by rule 6. But I don’t agree with rule 3–you need to point out the small things that people can’t see for themselves. It’s part of your job as a critiquer.

  • Ellen Hart says on September 18th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Great tips! I’ve had a diverse bunch of employees over the years, and I’ve found that the best constructive criticism takes into account the person as an individual. Get to know your employee’s strenthgs and sensitivities.

  • Jim Vernon says on September 18th, 2008 at 12:46 pm

    Am I the only one who would appreciate the irony of a really scathing reply?

    Seriously, though, good tips, but four more would be helpful. (See? I learned something!)

  • Thursday Bram says on September 18th, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    You caught me! I guess maybe another good tip, although not on critiquing, is to write your title after you write your post — rather than before.

  • Mat Packer says on September 18th, 2008 at 7:41 pm

    I think I might have to forward this article to 3/4’s of flickr where often people ask their images to be critiqued but when they don’t get the comment they were hoping for they do the ‘you suck, you don’t know what you’re talking about’ defence…and then they delete your comment..

  • Newton says on September 19th, 2008 at 12:01 am

    Not bad, but 7 is too many :)

    Hence, my 3 tips for providing feedback:
    1. Be targeted and detailed – what exactly is “wrong” and why is it wrong
    2. Be improvement focused – say how to start on the road to improving areas that need it
    3. Close the feedback loop – allow those being critiqued to enter a dialogue with you

  • Miguel de Luis says on September 19th, 2008 at 5:05 am

    I used a similar approach when I taught at HS, and I can bear witness that the students are much more inclined to correct their mistakes if you also tell them what they are doing right.

    Even if, in some cases, it takes a lot of good will to find what they have done right in their essays :)

  • EMotivate says on September 20th, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    I can give an example where a little positive feedback would have helped in a professional report.

    I had to write a letter asking for donations for a not-for-profit (not going to name any names). I wrote a letter and sent it over to the person in charge for feedback. I got a response that was about twice as long as the letter…

    It was rambling and mostly a lecture on “why” they would prefer things another way. But there was just so much of it that I came away thinking “boy, I really screwed that u’ so I scrapped it and started over. The second letter was thrown out because “they really liked the first letter, just wanted to use a few different words”.

    Well, why didn’t they just say that the first time?

Post your comment

Continue your discussions at Lifehack Community.

Get your own Avatars at Gravatars.
Three FREE Audiobooks RISK-FREE from Audible
Recent Writers SEE MORE
Latest Poll

Do you like the new design?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...