July 14th, 2008 in Featured, Management

How to Lead Change in Your Organization

Lead Change

Change is the biggest constant in today’s business world. Even charities and educational organizations are finding that they need to constantly innovate not only to compete for donation dollars, clients, and members, but to remain relevant to the changing social landscape around them as well.

But people hate change. Right? The management literature is loaded with tales of corporate innovation gone awry – product launches flubbed, reorganizations that caused productivity to plummet and workers to flee en masses, hideously stupid morale programs that mandated chipperness and received resignations in return, and so on. When workers at any organization get together, they swap stories of corporate inanity, laughing at each other’s tales of programs too stupid to have been thought of in the first place, let alone implemented – yet they were.

No, the common wisdom goes, people don’t want change. They want the steady footing of corporate constancy.

A vast number of books have been written about how to resolve this problem: companies need change, but workers hate it. Graduate management programs dedicate countless semester-hours to coping with this conflict. Executives wring their hands over the tension between their needs and employees’ unwillingness.

All for nothing.

As Michael Kanazawa, author of Big Ideas to Big Results points out in the title of his new e-book at ChangeThis, people don’t hate change, they hate how you’re trying to change them.

People LOVE change

People don’t hate change, they love it. Workers constantly seek promotions and new job responsibilities. They buy self-help books and personal development books seeking to become better at their jobs. They launch their own businesses. They change companies and jobs, they even change careers, all for the sake of breaking out of unsatisfying routines and gaining control over the conditions of their own labor.

People love change, they just hate having change rammed down their throats. They hate being sold a bill of goods, and too many corporate innovations feel like a bill of goods to the workers expected to implement them.

Three principles for change people love

Kanazawa got his start as a corporate strategist at the same company where Scott Adams gave birth to Dilbert. I think it’s safe to say that Pacific Telesis was a company that got change wrong. Repeatedly. Much to our general amusement.

Frustrated by the ham-handed – and almost always unsuccessful — way that change was managed there, Kanazawa sought out a different way of approaching change. In People Don’t Hate Change, he lays out the three principles companies need to embrace to create real innovation that their employees will get behind:

Do more on less

Workers fear the latest new program to come across their desk because they’ve learned that change means more work – for them. These fears are confirmed when management invites them into the conference room or meeting hall for the inevitable “pep rally” and gushes about the new program – and then tells them that they must “do more with less”.

It appeals to our core values of thrift and efficiency, this idea of doing more with less. It sells us – a little. But in the end doing more with less is impractical. Employees end up overtaxed by new responsibilities, frustrated by lack of resources, and resentful about all the work they’re doing with no extra compensation.

Instead, Kanazawa suggests that management demonstrate clearly what the new priorities are, and what is no longer a priority. Give workers a clear sense of what they should be focusing on, and get rid of the rest. Outsource it, or better yet cut it entirely.

Doing more on less means doing more work, more thinking, and more activity on less stuff. It means focusing employees’ efforts where they count, instead of splitting their attention twenty different ways.

There’s no such thing as buy-in

Companies know the value of “buy-in” when pushing radical new programs. Buy-in is that sense among workers that they hold a stake in the success of a project, that it’s theirs, somehow – they’ve “bought into” the new program.

Typically, companies will assign a leadership team, outside consultants, or project group in a division to design a new program. Once the plan is finalized, they’ll go to the employees who will be responsible for implementing the new plan for a buy-in meeting. They “sell” the plan, and employees “buy in”.

Except, they don’t. They may think it’s a great idea, they may be enthusiastic about it, but in the end, it’s not their plan.

Kanazawa advocates a different approach to innovation – bring employees in from the start, rely on their practical experience and expertise and incorporate their ideas into the plan. Follow their lead.

When workers are instrumental in creating change in their organization, there is no need for buy-in because the ideas are already theirs.

Leadership is not about you

A year ago, I debuted at Lifehack with a post on leadership, saying that leadership wasn’t about power, it was about empowering others. Kanazawa concurs, writing, “Leadership impact is not about how aggressive, decisive, and visionary you are, it is about how you bring that out in others.”

By empowering those around them to do more, true leaders drastically increase their own leadership power – their power scales with the ability of those around them.

It is important for leaders to have vision, authority, and ambition, but it is more important for them to reach out to others all along the chain of command to make sure that everyone feels involved in the process of change. Leaders who don’t do this, who attempt to impose their vision from the top-down, might manage to achieve something that looks like their vision, but which is hollow and empty.

Make change lovable

I’ve had Kanazawa’s book in my “to read” pile for a while, and I’m anxious to make time to read it. In the meantime, though, People Don’t Hate Change, They Hate How You’re Trying to Change Them gives a good introduction to the approach to change that Kanazawa has developed since leaving Dilbert-land. Keeping Kanazawa’s principles in mind can help any organization to leverage the love that people already have for true, meaningful change – instead of working against that love and forcing their employees into a reactionary, self-defensive position.

And that dissolves entirely the tension between companies’ need for change and workers’ distrust of it. When you make change lovable, there’s no need for hand-wringing.

WRITER'S BIOGRAPHY

Dustin Wax

Dustin M. Wax is a freelance writer and project manager at Stepcase Lifehack. He is also the creator of The Writer's Technology Companion, a site devoted to the tools of the writing trade. When he's not writing, he teaches anthropology and gender studies in Las Vegas, NV. He is the author of Don't Be Stupid: A Guide to Learning, Studying, and Succeeding at College.

Follow him on Twitter: @dwax.

ARTICLES BY THIS WRITER »
Don't want to miss any related posts like there? Subscribe to our feed!

Comments

  • Steven Sonsino says on July 14th, 2008 at 10:30 am

    Thanks Dustin for this great summary of the challenges facing managers who want to lead change.

    In my own research I’ve been looking at some of the barriers to leading change effectively and your readers might be interested to follow up with these two short pieces:

    The Death of Leadership

    How to Win at Leading Change

    We should probably stay connected… I sense an overlap in our areas of interest!

    Take care
    Steven Sonsino

  • Art Gonzalez says on July 14th, 2008 at 12:10 pm

    Great post. Very similar and expanding on these concepts is the book “Leadership Wisdom from the Monk who Sold his Ferrari”, by Robin Sharma. I highly recommend it.

    Many blessings,

    Art Gonzalez
    Check my Squidoo Lens at: Quantum Knights

  • Jeroen de Miranda says on July 14th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    ‘…bring employees in from the start, rely on their practical experience and expertise and incorporate their ideas into the plan…’

    I completely agree with this statement! Guiding me in Change programs are thoughts of John Kotter and some others writers. I have compiled this at: http://tinyurl.com/5sou4n

  • Michael Lee Stallard says on July 16th, 2008 at 6:32 am

    Dustin,

    Excellent post. I liked Mike Kanazawa’a book and e-book too. Mike and his Dissero Partners colleagues are doing some excellent work. Their ACT process is the best I’ve seen when it comes to engaging employees in change.

    Michael

  • Michael Kanazawa says on July 16th, 2008 at 5:32 pm

    Thank you, Dustin, for your interest and excellent take on our work. Also, thanks for all of the great comments and ideas from others regarding other related resources. I appreciate the comments putting my work in the company of Kotter and Sharma. I hope my work and expertise as a busienss executive first and author/consultant second can continue to add to the ongoing dialogue about how to lead strategic change and transformation.

    Mike

  • Lincoln says on July 19th, 2008 at 11:54 pm

    Hi Dustin

    Thanks for the post.

    I agree that some people love and embrace change, but I am certain that others loathe it. The company I work for has been through several major restructures in the last couple of years due to corporate shenanigans. The one constant through the whole experience has been change. I’ve found those that are predisposed towards fostering and growing their careers are open to change, but those that have no real prospects of career growth (for whatever reason) shun change.

    I do see that the management of the change process left a great deal to be desired, and that you make an excellent point about leadership needing to be about empowerment of team members, but I see personal disposition being a key variable. If self imposed change isn’t already part of the person’s life, they are unlikely to be open to change imposed on them by their employer.

    It’s possible that in a business with a culture of acceptance of change (I mean a really deep-rooted culture) that those pre-dispositions may be worn down and allow people to embrace change.

    Oh to work somewhere like that. :)

  • sean808080 says on July 21st, 2008 at 10:02 am

    so much is right on this although i’m not sure about the buy-in section. buy in is simply getting people to your way of thinking. it doesn’t refer to the origin of the solution although i absolutely agree that bringing stakeholders in at the front end is the way to go.

  • Sachin Gopal says on July 26th, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    This post seems eerily opposite to what i say here. My post date is on July 18th so i guess you beat me to it.

    http://sachingopal.com/motivating-losers/

  • United Voices says on July 26th, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    Thanks you a lot for this article on leadership. It was sort of a small session of leadership workshop for me.

  • Shreemani says on July 26th, 2008 at 4:06 pm

    Very informative article. Thanks a ton.

  • Ruth says on November 5th, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    If only more leaders would realize that leadership is NOT about them. It’s one of the reasons I enjoyed reading Darwin Gillett’s Noble Enterprise so much. He focuses on inspiring members of your organization to bring more of themselves to work and to tap into each person’s unique talents. It’s a brilliant blend of spiritual and business leadership practices.

  • Koku TSIGBE says on March 10th, 2009 at 5:35 am

    Dear SIR
    Iwould like to know how Lead organization can give a help to an association fighting agaist HIV/AIDS in Africa.In fact we are an association fighting agaist AIDS in Togo a french speaking country .We have care and support programme(medical,social,nutitional and psychological care).
    Thank you for your answer.

Post your comment

Continue your discussions at Lifehack Community.

Get your own Avatars at Gravatars.
Three FREE Audiobooks RISK-FREE from Audible
Recent Writers SEE MORE
Latest Poll

Do you like the new design?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...